Putin expecting unilateral concessions from Trump at their impending summit meeting

John Bolton, Trump's latest National Security Advisor, and a 'former' hawk on US-Russia relations, seems to have had a 'complete Trumpian conversion'.

As reported by Kathrin Hille,

" John Bolton, Donald Trump’s hawkish national security adviser, has hit out at criticism of the US president’s plans to meet Vladimir Putin, as the Kremlin said the two sides had agreed a date and location for the summit." (FT : 27 June, 2018) (my emphasis)

Putin is 'over the moon' about this impending summit between himself and Trump.

"Your visit to Moscow raises hopes that we may make the first step of restoration of fully fledged relations between our government", Putin said to Bolton at their meeting in Moscow. (video above :

Denis Pinchuk and Polina Ivanova : Reuters : 27 June, 2018) (my emphasis)

Recall that in my blog entry of [9/6/2018] I wrote that,

""Like a bolt out of the blue, Trump announced yesterday that a summit meeting between himself and Putin is being set up.
.....
As Brett Forrest and Peter Nicholas report,

"Any meeting between the two presidents would be expected to include discussions on Syria, Ukraine and nuclear-arms control. The summit’s purpose would be to resolve longstanding differences, people familiar with the matter said.
....
[Trump] added: “There is no reason for this. Russia needs us to help with their economy.” He went on to suggest that a more collaborative relationship with Russia could curb the arms race." (Wall Street Journal : June 1, 2018) (my emphasis)" (blog : 9/6/2018)

So like Kim Jong-UN,  is Putin expecting Trump to similarly announce that he is going to lift all those sanctions against Russia at their impending summit meeting? "

This will be high on Putin's summit agenda with Trump since Nord Stream 2, Putin's weaponized pipeline against Ukraine, depends on the decision of the Danish government whether or not to allow Nord Stream 2 to pass through their territorial waters.

Trump may pronounce at this impeding summit that 'no US sanctions will be taken against any EU companies helping Putin with building the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.(cf. blog entry [18/6/2018])

Also high on Putin's agenda will be a public recognition, by Trump, that Ukraine's Crimea really belongs to Russia.

 
Let us recall that even before the 2016 US presidential election, Trump legitimised Putin's illegal annexation of Ukraine's Crimea, blaming it on former US president Obama! 

And more recently Trump, once again, blamed former US President Obama for Putin illegally annexing Ukraine's Crimea.

As Alberto Nardelli and Julia Ioffe (left) reported,

"President Donald Trump told G7 leaders that Crimea is Russian because everyone who lives there speaks Russian, according to two diplomatic sources.
...
Trump also blamed former president Barack Obama for what happened in Ukraine. "Obama can say all he wants, but he allowed Russia to take Crimea," Trump said." (BuzzFeed News : June 14, 2018) (my emphasis)

All of which once again raises the central question of what possible hold Putin may have on Trump.

As Colonel Peters states in the above video,

"When I first learnt about the Steele dossier it just rang true to me because that's how the Russians do things. And before he became a candidate, Donald Trump was the perfect target for Russian intelligence.
....
In the future we are going to look back on the much maligned Christopher Steele who took that dossier to the FBI as something of a hero ...."

As in his summit with Kim Jong Un, where he unilaterally decided that the US will,

"..... end joint military exercises with South Korea [which] took South Korean and U.S. military officials by surprise..." (Josh Smith and Phil Stewart: Reuters : 12 June, 2018) (my emphasis),

are we in for surprise unilateral Trump concessions to Putin at their coming Helsinki summit meeting?

(to be continued)

Putin's pressure on Denmark grows greater by the day.

In my blog entry of 10/4/2018, I wrote that,

"Germany has approved the construction and operation of the Russia-built Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, its operator and the German maritime authority said on Tuesday.
...
The Nord Stream 2 operator said it expected that other four countries along the route of the undersea gas pipeline – Russia, Finland, Sweden and Denmark – will issue permits in the coming months." (Reuters : March 27, 2018) (my emphasis)

"Unfortunately, however, whilst Finland has recently given Putin permission "to use the Finnish Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) for the construction of the pipeline", little Denmark finds itself in a real political quandary over whether it, too, should allow Putin's gas pipeline to cross through its territorial waters.

As reported by Stine Jacobsen and Alissa de Carbonnel (left),

"The Danish government is facing fierce lobbying by Russia, EU allies and the United States over the 9.5 billion euro ($11.7 billion) Nord Stream 2 project championed by President Vladimir Putin and financed by five Western firms.
 ...
A Danish veto, under new legislation allowing it to do so on security grounds, would force Russia, which supplies about one third of Europe’s gas needs, to find a new route for the pipeline.
...
“This is not about gas, it is one of the most important foreign policy decisions in Denmark since the Cold War,” said senior foreign policy researcher Hans Mouritzen at the Danish Institute for International Studies." (Reuters : March 26, 2018) (my emphasis)" (blog)

And just recently,

"Denmark is the last hold out in Europe, yet to give permission for the construction of the controversial Nord Stream 2 pipeline after the Swedish government became the latest EU country to sign off on construction permissions for the pipeline that will carry Russian gas from the Yamal peninsula under the Baltic Sea to Germany." (bneIntelliNews : June 13, 2018) (my emphasis)

“This is an important milestone for the Nord Stream 2 project. We are pleased to have obtained the Swedish government’s approval to construct and operate the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline,” said Lars O Grönstedt, Senior Advisor at Nord Stream 2, quoted in an official press release." (Georgi Gotev (left):EuroActiv : June 11, 2018)

 One can now begin to imagine the increasing pressure that will be exerted on the Danish parliament to also give Putin permission for his Nord Steam 2 pipeline to pass through Danish waters.

 All those countries which have given Putin his Nord Stream 2 "Go Past Go and collect $100" Monopoly ticket cannot simply argue that their decisions are based purely on economic criteria.

What their decisions have done is to actively support Putin in weaponizing this pipeline against Ukraine.

As Hans Mouritzen correctly argues,

“This is not about gas, it is one of the most important foreign policy decisions in Denmark since the Cold War.” (ibid Stine Jacobsen and Alissa de Carbonnel)

This decision of Sweden has even further significance in view of Trump's determination to steam ahead with his summit with Putin.

 
As reported by Jeff Zeleny, Zachary Cohen and Michelle Kosinski,

"Moscow and Washington are "exploring" the possibility of a meeting between the two leaders, according to US officials and a Russian media report.
...

While nothing is imminent, the official acknowledged there are ongoing discussions of setting up a Putin-Trump face-to-face.

...

Another source with the National Security Council said a meeting "is being worked on" and a diplomatic source added that a meeting is likely to happen soon." (CNN : 15 June, 2018) (my emphasis)

Key for Putin at this impending summit between himself and Trump will be to ensure that no US sanctions will be imposed on EU companies helping in the construction of the Nord Sea 2 pipeline IF Denmark also gives permission for it to pass through Danish waters.

As William Wilkes  recently reported,

"The U.S. stepped up its opposition to the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline linking Russia and Germany, saying the project raises security concerns and that it could draw U.S. sanctions.
...
U.S. threats to Nord Stream 2, which has split eastern and western EU states, could impact companies in Austria, France, Germany and the Netherlands. (Bloomberg : May 17, 2018) (my emphasis)


Let us now recall that at the Trump-Kim Jong Un summit, Trump suddenly announced that he was ending the joint military exercises between the US and South Korea. (Brad Lendon : CNN : June 12, 2018)

When the Trump-Putin summit takes places, will he also suddenly announce that Nord Stream 2 can go ahead, without the incurring of US sanctions on EU companies helping to build Nord Stream 2?

Everything now depends on the decision that the Danish parliament will take regarding Nord Stream 2 passing through their territorial waters. 

• If they say "No", then no matter what Trump says, Nord Stream 2 will be scuppered. 
• If they say "Yes", then Trump will go against the US government.

Putin's pressure on Denmark grows greater by the day.

(to be continued)

Like Kim Jong-UN, is Putin expecting Trump to announce that he is going to lift US sanctions against Russia at their impending summit meeting?

The big buildup to the Trump - Kim Jong UN meeting in Singapore has subsided, and the actual meeting itself had ended not so much with a bang, but rather with a whimper.

More than anything else, this meeting has propelled Kim Jong-Un onto the international stage, to his obvious delight.

 

What has somewhat been hidden from view is an interview given by Putin to the new China Media Group, prior to Trump's Singapore meeting.

What is interesting is just how much of what Putin said about the situation regarding North Korea during his pre-Singapore interview, and what Trump subsequently said during his speech and press conference after his meeting with Kim Jong-Un, uncannily mirror critical statements made by each other.

Indeed, one could almost conclude that Putin must have had a hand in drafting Trump's Singapore speech.

 

And just as Trump and Kim Jong-Un had their 'summit' meeting in Singapore,

"The German, French, Russian, and Ukrainian foreign ministers were meeting in Berlin late on June 11 for talks on bringing an end to the fighting in eastern Ukraine.

The meeting -- the first of the "Normandy" group in more than a year -- focused on implementing an unfulfilled peace agreement reached in 2015 and the possibility of deploying a UN peacekeeping mission in the conflict zone." (RF/ERL : June 11, 2018) (my emphasis)

The sticking point for Putin about the deployment of UN troops is that,

"Germany and France (and Ukraine) want UN troops to be deployed in all areas controlled by Russia-backed rebels, including on the Ukraine-Russia border"(ibid RF/ERL,

whereas Putin simply wants them to patrol along the line of contact in the Donbas.

As reported by Michael Nienaber (left),

"German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas said after the four-way talks that Russia and Ukraine agreed in principle on a UN peacekeeping mission, but their ideas about how to implement it were still “very much apart.”(Reuters : June 11, 2018) (my emphasis)

"What", we may ask, "does Putin have to gain in upturning this latest 'Normandy Group Meeting', especially in light of the dire state of the Russian economy?"

Which brings us back to that recent Trump-Kim Jong-UN summit in Singapore.

A few minutes ago the BBC reported that,

"North Korea has celebrated the Trump-Kim summit as a great win for the country, with state media reporting that the US intends to lift sanctions." (BBC : 13 June, 2018)

And in a recent blog entry (9/6/2018) I wrote that,

"Like a bolt out of the blue, Trump announced yesterday that a summit meeting between himself and Putin is being set up.
.....
As Brett Forrest and Peter Nicholas report,

"Any meeting between the two presidents would be expected to include discussions on Syria, Ukraine and nuclear-arms control. The summit’s purpose would be to resolve longstanding differences, people familiar with the matter said.
....
[Trump] added: “There is no reason for this. Russia needs us to help with their economy.” He went on to suggest that a more collaborative relationship with Russia could curb the arms race." (Wall Street Journal : June 1, 2018) (my emphasis)" (blog : 9/6/2018)

So like Kim Jong-UN,  is Putin expecting Trump to similarly announce that he is going to lift all those sanctions against Russia at their impending summit meeting? 

(to be continued) 

Trump is actively supporting Putin by opening up a rift between the US and its European allies.

In my last blog entry I posed the question,

"Trump, having set in motion this trade war with the EU, among others, we have to now ask ourselves the following question,

"Like Merkel, how far will Trump go to bail out Putin from his economic travails?"" (blog entry: 2-6-2018)

Trump has now answered that question.

As reported by Julian Borger and Anne Perkins ,

" Donald Trump has called for Russia to be readmitted to the G7 club of world leaders, opening up a new rift with US allies who swiftly contradicted him at a contentious summit in Quebec." (The Guardian : Fri 8 Jun 2018) (my emphasis) 

  

British Prime Minister, Teresa May, has responded to Trump's call for re-instating Putin into the G7.

"We should remind ourselves why the G8 became the G7, it was because Russia illegally annexed Crimea.
 
'We have seen malign activity from Russia in a whole variety of ways, of course including on the streets of Salisbury in the UK.

'So we need to say, I think, before any such conversations can take place Russia needs to change its approach." (Kate Ferguson and John Stevens : Mail Online : 8 June 2018) (my emphasis) (cf. also: CNN : Business Insider : The Hill)

 
Little did those at Maidan in 2014 realise just where their overthrow of Putin's puppet, the then president of Ukraine, Victor Yanukovich (right), would lead to. 

Putin and Trump cannot escape from this 'Thread of Maidan' that binds them together tightly.

It is this 'Thread of Maidan'  that not only has led to Putin being evicted from the G8 but, more significantly, has led to the crippling EU-US sanctions against Putin for his annexation of Ukrainian Crimea and his ongoing war with Ukraine, 

 Whilst Putin may now be riding the crest of a wave with Trump, it is reported that,

"The UN Security Council has unanimously condemned the "continuous violations of the cease-fire" in eastern Ukraine and called for an immediate withdrawal of heavy weapons." (RFERL : June 07, 2018) (my emphasis)

Notice in this "condemnation" that the primary perpetrators of these 'ceasefire violation' viz. Putin's Russian soldiers and his proxies in the Donbas, have NOT been condemned. 

It is for this reason that the Russian ambassador to the UN stated that,

"It's been a long time since the council adopted anything on Ukraine and we are very happy," Russian UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya (right) said after the vote, calling the resolution's reaffirmation of the Minsk agreement "very constructive." (ibid RFERL) (my emphasis)

No doubt that at the back of Nebenzya's mind when agreeing to this UN Security Council statement is the fact that,

"The European Union in March extended its sanctions by another six months, but the coming to power of more pro-Russian governments in Italy, Austria, Hungary, and elsewhere has increased calls within the bloc for easing the sanctions." (ibid RFERL) (my emphasis)

And whilst this Security Council condemnation was being agreed upon by Putin's mouthpiece at the UN, the Moscow Times reports that,

"President Vladimir Putin on Thursday warned Kiev of "very serious consequences for Ukrainian statehood" if it were to launch military action against pro-Russian rebels in the east during the football World Cup, which begins in Russia next week." (The Moscow Times : Jun 09, 2018) (my emphasis),

whilst at the same time, UNIAN reports that,

"The Russian occupation troops are carrying out terrain mining with the use of Russian-made anti-personnel mines, which are prohibited by international law." (UNIAN : 08 June, 2018) (my emphasis)

And ...... ,

"Russia's hybrid military forces mounted 37 attacks on Ukrainian army positions in Donbas in the past 24 hours, with four Ukrainian soldiers reported as wounded in action (WIA)." (UNIAN : 08 June,2018) (my emphasis)

All of which rather calls into question the motivation of Putin's UN mouthpiece, Vasily Nebenzya, agreeing to the UN Security Council 'condemnation' of the ceasefire violations in the Donbas, without the Security Council identifying Putin's Russian soldiers and his proxies as being the prime instigators thereof.

Trump is emboldening Putin by opening up a new rift between the US and its European allies.

 
Will this Trumpian rift also embolden the pro-Russian governments in Italy, Austria, Hungary, and elsewhere to mount a concerted and vigorous attack against the current EU sanctions hanging around Putin's neck?

(to be continued)

Like Merkel, how far will Trump go to bail out Putin from his economic travails?

Like a bolt out of the blue, Trump announced yesterday that a summit meeting between himself and Putin is being set up.

Now a summit meeting is,

" ... an international meeting of heads of state or government, usually with considerable media exposure, tight security, and a prearranged agenda." (Wikipedia)

As Brett Forrest and Peter Nicholas report,

"Any meeting between the two presidents would be expected to include discussions on Syria, Ukraine and nuclear-arms control. The summit’s purpose would be to resolve longstanding differences, people familiar with the matter said.
....
[Trump] added: “There is no reason for this. Russia needs us to help with their economy.” He went on to suggest that a more collaborative relationship with Russia could curb the arms race." (Wall Street Journal : June 1, 2018) (my emphasis)

Now recall that in my last blog entry I wrote that,

"And whilst Putin's anger is now focusing itself on mounting a fully-fledged cyber attack against Ukraine, nonetheless the Putinversteher Angela Merkel concluded her meeting in Sochi with Putin (18 May, 2018), emphasizing that,

"We have strategic interests to maintain good relations with Russia ..."

To which Putin responded,

"Germany is one of our key trade partners ... We just started to buy German goods in higher volumes, which supports jobs in Germany" (blog entry: 24/5/2018)

Both Trump and Merkel seem, ironically, to be "concerned" in helping Putin out of the economic morass into which he has plunged the Russian economy.

And whilst Trump states that, "Russia needs us to help with their economy",Nikki Hayley (right), the US representative at the UN, stated in no uncertain terms that,

"We condemn, in the strongest terms, Russia's involvement in eastern Ukraine and its purported annexation of Crimea," said Haley, promising US sanctions will remain in place until Russia withdraws from the long-simmering conflict, which she called "a textbook example of the direct violation of the sovereignty of one (UN) member state by another member state." (Laura Koran : CNN : May 29, 2018) (my emphasis)

 As Trump is gearing up for a summit with Putin, Dough Palmer (left) reports that,

"The Trump administration will impose new duties on steel and aluminum imports from three key trading partners — the European Union, Canada and Mexico — after failing to reach deals with them to address national security concerns related to the imports, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said Thursday." (Politico : 31 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

Trump, having set in motion this trade war with the EU, among others, we have to now ask ourselves the following question,

"Like Merkel, how far will Trump go to bail out Putin from his economic travails?" 

Even more pertinent,

"How far will Merkel's and Trump's bailout of Putin from his economic travails undermine the EU-US sanctions against Putin because of his illegal annexation of Ukrainian Crimea, and his ongoing war with Ukraine?"

(to be continued)

How far will Merkel go to bail out Putin from his current economic travails?

In my last blog entry (16/5/2018) I wrote that,

"Hedging his bets in case his Kerch bridge proves to be the 'white elephant' that it is, Putin has begun to accelerate his attempt to secure a land-bridge connection between Russia and Ukraine."

As UNIAN reports,

• The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) to Ukraine has reported it spotted a significant accumulation of heavy weapons near the occupied village of Buhaivka in Donbas. (UNIAN: 22 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

• The occupation forces attacked Ukrainian troops 53 times in the past day. In particular, 30 attacks were mounted with the use of proscribed 122mm artillery systems, 120mm and 82mm mortars. (UNIAN: 22 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

However, it is also reported that,

"Ukraine conducted first launches of the Javelin missile systems today, May 22.

"Finally this day has come! Today, for the first time in Ukraine, the launch of Javelin missile complexes took place. This is a very effective defensive weaponry, which is used in the event of Russian offensive on the positions of Ukrainian troops," Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko wrote on Twitter." (UNIAN : 22 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

 

As well as conducting their first test of the Javelin Anti-Tank missile, UNIAN also reported that,

"The Ukrainian Armed Forces have repelled a militant subversive group that attempted to force the Ukrainian army out of the recently liberated village of Pivdenne in Donetsk region." (UNIAN : 21 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

Spitting nails, Putin has now decided to intensify his cyber attacks against Ukraine.

As reported by Jim Finkle and Pavel Polityuk,

"The U.S. government said late on Wednesday that it would seek to wrestle hundreds of thousands of infected routers and storage devices from the control of hackers who security researchers warned were planning to use the “botnet” to attack Ukraine.
...
Cisco said the largest number of infections from the VPNFilter malware were in Ukraine, which led it to believe Russia was planning an attack on that country. " (Reuters : May 23, 2018) (my emphasis) 
 

And whilst Putin's anger is now focusing itself on mounting a fully-fledged cyber attack against Ukraine, nonetheless the Putinversteher Angela Merkel concluded her meeting in Sochi with Putin (18 May, 2018), emphasizing that,

"We have strategic interests to maintain good relations with Russia ..." (see video below)

To which Putin responded,

"Germany is one of our key trade partners ... We just started to buy German goods in higher volumes, which supports jobs in Germany" (see video below)

Yet again am I reminded of the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo that was signed between Germany and Russia, in particular Article 5, which states that,

• Article 5: The two Governments shall co-operate in a spirit of mutual goodwill in meeting the economic needs of both countries. In the event of a fundamental settlement of the above question on an international basis, an exchange of opinions shall previously take place between the two Governments. The German Government, having lately been informed of the proposed agreements of private firms, declares its readiness to give all possible support to these arrangements and to facilitate their being carried into effect.

The $64 question is,

"Just how far will Merkel go to bail out Putin from his current economic travails?" 

(to be continued)

The millstone of sanctions around Putin's neck is becoming unbearable.

In my blog entry of May 1, 2018, I wrote that,

"Unfortunately for Putin, as AT writes,

"On the Crimean bridge began to collapse support. The bridge can already be called emergency. According to safety rules, it is already necessary to demolish the problematic support and build a new one
...
But this concrete will create a huge load on the piles... 
...
If the bridge is opened and a stream of cars is allowed, it will cause even more load.
...
Many people will not even know that they are going to the emergency bridge, because the Russian propogandists were given a command that says nothing about it. (AT : YouTube : 24 Apr 2018) (my emphasis) (cf. also: Igor Korsakov)"

Fifteen days later,

"Russian President Vladimir Putin has attended the opening of the Crimean bridge.
...
 Being at the wheel of a Kamaz truck, Putin led a column of trucks.
...
Motor traffic along the Crimean bridge will be opened at 05:30 on May 16" (UNIAN : 15 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

Putin, however, is also well aware of the serious problems that beset his Kerch Bridge, a bridge that may soon turn out to be a "white elephant".

A white elephant is a possession which its owner cannot dispose of and whose cost, particularly that of maintenance, is out of proportion to its usefulness.

The remarks of Ukrainian President, Petro Poroshenko, rather neatly sums up this opening of Putin's bridge.

""The illegal construction of the Kerch Strait Bridge is more evidence of Kremlin neglect of international law
...
"Russia will be fully responsible, and the bridge will be necessary for the invaders when they leave our Crimea urgently," Poroshenko said. (Interfax-Ukraine: 15.05.2018) (my emphasis)

Hedging his bets in case his Kerch bridge proves to be the 'white elephant' that it is, Putin has begun to accelerate his attempt to secure a land-bridge connection between Russia and Ukraine.

As reported by UNIAN, 

• "Russian-led forces mounted 80 attacks on Ukrainian troops in Donbas, eastern Ukraine, in the past day...In particular, the Russian occupation forces attacked the Ukrainian forces 22 times with the use of artillery systems and mortars, and there were two tank attacks ..." (7 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

• "Fierce fighting with Russian-led troops in Donbas, eastern Ukraine, continued on Saturday, May 12, as a result of which one Ukrainian soldier was killed in action, another four were wounded in action." (13 May, 2018)

• "The Russian-led forces in Donbas, eastern Ukraine, have started using the latest weapons against the Ukrainian army. A few days ago, the enemy launched the newest rockets to shell Ukrainian positions near the Ukrainian-controlled strategic port city of Mariupol" (13 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

• "Russian-led forces mounted 45 attacks on Ukrainian troops in Donbas in the past day, using heavy weapons 17 times. "Over the past 24 hours, the situation remained tense. The fighting intensified after 16:00 and continued in all sectors," (16 May, 2018) (my emphasis) 

As Kurt Volker is being given new powers as the US representative in Ukraine, UAWire reports that,

"Volker and Vladislav Surkov (right: Volker and Surkov) did not reach an agreement in the negotiations.
...
The stumbling point was  the law about the reintegration of the Donbas." (UAWire : Tuesday, May 15, 2018) (my emphasis)

And after [Kurt Volker's] visit to the Donbas, the first trip of the U.S. envoy to eastern Ukraine since the start of the JFO, the new military operation of the Ukrainian government in the conflict-hit region, Volker realised that,

"If Russia will veto the decision on peacekeepers, it means Kremlin wants to continue the war." (LiveUAmap: 15 May, 2018) (my emphasis) 

Putin's current escalation of the war between Ukraine and Russia should also be viewed against the backdrop of the effects that the new US sanctions against Russia are having, especially among his kleptocratic "inner circle".

As Benjamin Bathke and Elena Barysheva Report,

"Russian lawmakers have drafted a bill that would make it a criminal offence punishable by up to four years in jail to observe sanctions imposed by the United States or other foreign countries, Russian news agencies reported on Tuesday." (DW : 15.05.2018) (my emphasis)

To soften this blow on ordinary Russian citizens, Jamie Dettmer reports that,

"Initially, Russian lawmakers said they would impose restrictions on a wide range of specific goods and services from the United States, including medicine and agricultural products; but, in the draft legislation approved on May 15, language that targeted specific goods to soften the impact on Russian consumers and industries was removed." (VOA : 15 May, 2018) (my emphasis)

Russia is also starting to print money to assist Putin's billionaires who are now under US sanctions.

As UAWire reports,

"The Russian government has already given assistance to sanctioned billionaire Viktor Vekselberg’s Renova Group, and is currently working on financial support measures for Oleg Deripaska’s companies, including Rusal and the GAZ group, as announced on Monday by Russia’s acting  Finance Minister Anton Siluanov." (UAWire : Tuesday, May 15, 2018) (my emphasis)

This printing of money by Putin already amounts to $ billions. (ibid UAWire)

So whilst Putin was driving his truck along the emergency bridge of his Kerch bridge, he drove with a troubled mind.

Bailing out his 'inner circle' from the sanctions imposed upon them by the US, by printing billions upon billions of Roubles, shows that Putin is a worried man.
 
The millstone of sanctions around his neck is already becoming unbearable. 

(to be continued)

Will Putin fall into the abyss of starting World War 3?

The scarlet thread of Maidan has once again bubbled to the surface of  US Special Prosecutor Mueller's investigation into the Trump-Putin collusion during the 2016 US Presidential elections.

As reported by Andrew E. Kramer (left),

" ... in Ukraine, where officials are wary of offending President Trump, four meandering cases that involve Mr. Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, have been effectively frozen by Ukraine’s chief prosecutor.

The cases are just too sensitive for a government deeply reliant on United States financial and military aid, and keenly aware of Mr. Trump’s distaste for the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into possible collusion between Russia and his campaign, some lawmakers say.

The decision to halt the investigations by an anticorruption prosecutor was handed down at a delicate moment for Ukraine, as the Trump administration was finalizing plans to sell the country sophisticated anti-tank missiles, called Javelins." (New York Times : May 2, 2018) (my emphasis) (cf. also: UNIAN 3 May, 2018)

 

Jonathan Chait (right) also writes that,

"Donald Trump’s habitual dishonesty is a trait well understood by the entire mainstream news media, ...
The last few hours alone have brought news of fresh new forms of Trumpian dishonesty that have managed to shock even the people who were looking for it.

"Supporters of the [Trump] administration held up the sale [to Ukraine, of the US Javelin anti-tank missiles] as evidence that Trump could not have colluded with Russia — here he was, arming Russia’s enemy.
...
It is far more likely that somebody in the administration proposed a quid pro quo, and Ukraine quite rationally decided it would rather have weapons to defend itself against the next Russian aggression than participate in an investigation that the president of the United States regards as a mortal threat." (New York Magazine : May 2, 2018) (my emphasis)

And the next Russian aggression is not far off on the horizon.

On 16th March, 2018, UNIAN reported that,

"Russia has strengthened its military presence on the border with Ukraine as several mechanized divisions are fully prepared for intervention, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said, speaking before the Ukrainian troops in Luhansk region Friday, referring to a report by the commander of the Anti-Terrorist Operation.
...
"In his latest report, General Zabrodsky (chief of the ATO forces and commander of the landing-attack troops of the AFU Gen. Mykhailo Zabrodsky] reported in detail on the strengthening of the military presence of the Russian Federation along our border and continued stay of Russia's regular troops in the occupied territories," the president said." (UNIAN : 16 March, 2018) (my emphasis)

Carly Read further reports that, 

"US and Ukrainian officials have blasted Russia for reportedly shepherding in hundreds of tanks and rockets into the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine.
...
Alexander Vershbow (right), former US state department official at the Atlantic Council said: “The provision of Javelins as well as the tightening of sanctions against Russia provides essential leverage to achieve a negotiated solution.” (Express : May 2, 2018) (my emphasis)

It has now also being reported by Natalia Zinets and Alessandra Prentice that,

"Ukraine has decided to expand sanctions on Russian companies and entities to mirror those of the United States, which has blacklisted tycoons and allies of Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said on Wednesday.
...
Kiev has also extended existing sanctions it introduced against hundreds of Russian companies and entities in response to the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and Kremlin support for a pro-Russian separatist uprising in eastern Ukraine." (Reuters : May 2, 2018) (my emphasis)
 
Putin is now teetering on the edge of a full scale invasion of Ukraine.

But the Ukrainian Army is now more than a match for Putin's proxies and Russian soldiers in the Donbas, thanks in part to those Javelin missiles.

Will Putin fall into the abyss of starting World War 3?

(to be continued)

Will Trump's trade war with the EU cause the EU sanctions against Putin to crack?

"The law about riding the tiger of deception states that, "The longer you stay on, the easier it is to fall off."

In October of 2014,

"Russian President Vladimir Putin yesterday ordered government agencies responsible for major construction projects to build a bridge across the Kerch Strait connecting Crimea and Russia before the end of 2018.

The order was given on Wednesday at a session of the State Council, the country’s main consultative body, in Novosibirsk, Russian news agency TASS reported." (Global Construction Review : 9 October 2014) (my emphasis) 

Unfortunately for Putin, as AT writes,

"On the Crimean bridge began to collapse support. The bridge can already be called emergency. According to safety rules, it is already necessary to demolish the problematic support and build a new one
...
But this concrete will create a huge load on the piles... 
...
If the bridge is opened and a stream of cars is allowed, it will cause even more load.
...
Many people will not even know that they are going to the emergency bridge, because the Russian propogandists were given a command that says nothing about it. (AT : YouTube : 24 Apr 2018) (my emphasis) (cf. also: Igor Korsakov)

Adding to his problems with a critical part of his Kerch Bridge in danger of collapse, Putin now also has to contend with the fact that,

"Ukraine has received the first U.S. Javelin missiles and launch units, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said on Monday. (Pavel Polityuk : Reuters :30 April :2018) (my emphasis)

And whilst the Kerch bridge is collapsing, and the Ukrainian Army becomes even more of a powerful adversary against Putin's forces in the Donbas,

"The G7 Foreign Ministers have said sanctions against Russia will continue.
...
"Minister [Minister of International Trade of Canada Chrystia] Freeland and G7 Foreign Ministers reaffirmed our shared respect for rules-based international order, including on territorial sovereignty. Sanctions imposed on Russia following its unacceptable actions in Ukraine will continue," Canada's Foreign Ministry wrote on Twitter on April 22, 2018." (UNIAN : 23 April, 2018) (my emphasis)

In response to these negative developments,

"Ukraine's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) calls on the international community to put more pressure on Russia over recent escalation in Donbas, eastern Ukraine. "Russia needs destabilization of Ukraine. 61 attacks, mortars used. 7 UA WIA [wounded in action]. Urge partners exert more pressure on Ru," MFA press secretary Mariana Betsa (left) wrote on Sunday, April 29." (UNIAN : 29 April, 2018) (my emphasis)

It is therefore no wonder that,

"A special order will be in effect with the decision of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on the start of the operation of joint forces in the area of Donetsk and Luhansk regions.

The resolution on the special order was handed to Interfax-Ukraine by the Command of the joint headquarters on Friday.

The resolution will take effect on Monday, April 30." (Kyiv Post : April 28, 2018) (my emphasis)

Giving Putin some cheer is the fact that Trump is not budging on his recently pronounced tariffs on  steel and aluminium from the EU.

His recent meeting with Angela Merkel was, to say the least, somewhat frosty.

As reported by Julie Hirschfeld Davis,

"President Trump and Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany made no attempt on Friday to hide their disagreements over the future of the Iran nuclear deal and trade relations between the United States and Europe after a day of White House meetings that appeared to have produced no breakthroughs on major disputes. (New York Times : 27 April, 2018) (my emphasis)

Shawn Donnan and Jim Brunsden (left) also report that,
 
"The White House on Monday said the EU, Canada and Mexico had been given a “final” 30-day window to negotiate deals with the Trump administration to permanently avoid the import taxes. Mr Trump said he was imposing the duties in the name of “national security” and to combat global overcapacity in metals fed by soaring Chinese production over the past decade." (Financial Times : 1 May, 2018)
 
But, as  Daniel Boffey writes,

"The EU has warned that it will not “shoot from the hip” but is fully prepared for a trade war with the US amid heightened concerns that the bloc’s last minute crisis talks are doomed to fail." (The Guardian : 30 April, 2018) (my emphasis)

This is a trade war that Putin relishes since it will add pressure to the calls of German businessmen, in particular, to get rid of the EU sanctions imposed against Putin because of his illegal annexation of Ukrainian Crimea, and his ongoing war with Ukraine in the Donbas.  

As of yet we are not sure how the Danish parliament will react to the question of whether to grant Putin permission for his Nord Stream 2 pipeline to cross their territorial waters.

German businessmen are anxiously awaiting the decision of the Danes, as is Putin.

Whilst the EU may be ready for a Trade War with Donald Trump, the disagreements between Angela Merkel and Donald Trump may yet turn out to be the excuse that will be used to unravel the EU sanctions against Putin. 

Like the Kerch bridge, will Trump's trade war with the EU cause the EU sanctions against Putin to begin to crack.

(to be continued)