Putin will collapse Minsk meeting this coming Wednesday (10 Feb. 2015)

“Look,” said Ms. Merkel, who, like President François Hollande of France, had just returned from hours of negotiations with Mr. Putin, “I grew up in East Germany, and when I was 7 the Berlin Wall was built.”

Nobody expected the West to mount a military attack to bring it down, she said, meaning that East Germans waited 28 more years in “dictatorship and unfreedom” until the Wall came down in November 1989. (AlisonSmale: New York Times : Feb. 8, 2015)

Comparing the Berlin Wall, a physical object, with what is now happening in Ukraine rather says it all about Merkel's attitude towards the invasion of eastern Ukraine, and the annexing of Ukrainian Crimea, by Putin's Russia. Comparing the current annexing of Ukrainian Crimea and the invasion of eastern Ukraine with the building of the Berlin Wall is equivalent to comparing 'apples and oranges' viz. a misleading argument that is rather popular in advertising.

In making this comparison, is Merkel suggesting that Ukrainians have to accept eastern Ukraine being annexed by Putin, and that those Ukrainians already living in Ukrainian Crimea and eastern Ukraine will simply have to endure living under Putin's yoke until he leaves office, probably in 2024?

Even more frightening, this attitude of hers reveals just how deep the "Russland Versteher" (one who 'understands' Russia) has soaked into the minds of Germans from both the left and the right of the German political spectrum, as well as within German industry, thanks to the 1970's 'Ostpolitik' of Willy Brandt.

German business & Ukraine

As The Economist pointed out, "The boards of Germany’s large companies are also well stocked with Russophiles. In March (when Crimea was annexed into the Russian Federation) Joe Kaeser, the boss of Siemens, an industrial conglomerate, met Mr Putin in Moscow and signalled business as usual." (The Economist : May 10th 2014 : Berlin)

 Is it any wonder now that many are beginning to seriously question Merkel's stand over supplying defensive weaponry to Ukraine, as a counter to the flood of sophisticated weaponry entering eastern Ukraine from Russia?

As she says at the press conference with Obama after their breakfast meeting yesterday,

".... on diplomatics initiatives ... And this is going to be continued ..." (C-Span : 9 Feb., 2015)

Even though she admits that thus far all diplomatic efforts to resolve the Ukraine crisis with Putin have failed miserably, nonetheless she continues with her mantra about a 'diplomatic' solution, totally governed by the old saying that,

 "If at first you don't succeed

Try and try and try again"

Meanwhile, the bodies of both Ukrainians and Russians will continue to pile up.

President Obama, on the other hand, is caught in the vice of time, having soon to decide whether to send defensive armaments to Ukraine.

" ... the deadline ..  for the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 to come into FULL effect on the 16th February 2015. This Act mandates Obama into making a decision on sending military hardware to Ukraine since the Act includes the following:

(i) Provisions for training, defense articles, anti-tank weapons, anti-armor weapons, crew weapons, ammunition, counter-artillery radar, fire control, range diner, tactical troop-operated surveillance drones, and other equipment pursuant to the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act – Total of $350,000,000 over three years" (blog entry: 3rd Feb. 2015)

Thus, at the press conference with Merkel he had to state that,

" .... What other means can we put in place to change Mr. Putin's calculus. .. and the possibility of lethal defensive weapons is one of those options being examined ....." (ibid C-Span : 9 Feb., 2015)

Recall that on Sunday last, Merkel, Poroshenko, Hollande, and Putin held a 'Skype-type' conference at which,

"The plan for a meeting Wednesday in the Belarusian capital emerged from a phone call between German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President François Hollande, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. Merkel's spokesman, Steffen Seibert, described the call as “intensive.” (Today's Zaman : February 08, 2015, Sunday)

However Putin also confirmed that,

" ... a summit was being planned for Wednesday in Minsk, but said it might not come about." (ibid Today's Zaman) (my emphasis)

Putin visits Egypt

And on his visit to Egypt yesterday, Putin simply re-iterated his mantra that the US and the EU is totally responsible for what is happening in Ukraine.

"President Vladimir Putin has blamed the US and the European Union for what he called their “expansionist policies” for the crisis in Ukraine." (Euronews : 10 Feb., 2015)

Furthermore, he once again,

" ...... denied direct Russian involvement in the conflict and warned Kyiv to stop its military operations in the east and to hold talks with the rebels." (ibid Euronews) (my emphasis)

Yet again do we see the 'maskirovka' strategy of Putin in action.

Putin DOES NOT want to attend this coming Wednesday meeting in Minsk. Why?

Because his mind-set is governed by the "Novorossiya" ideology of his Rasputin, Alexander Dugin.

As he stated in his recent interview in Egypt with the Al-Ahram Daily Newspaper,

" .... in the framework of the EU Eastern Partnership Program there have been attempts to tear states which had been parts of the former USSR off Russia and to prompt them to make an artificial choice "between Russia and Europe." (Kremlin : President of Russia : February 9, 2015) (my emphasis)

 Having made this statement, can anyone see Putin back-tracking on it?

 (to be continued)

Putin is simply not ready to commit political suicide (9th Feb. 2015)

Last week's flurry of diplomatic activity culminated yesterday (8/2/2015) in Poroshenko, Merkel, Hollande, and Putin himself, having a 'Skype-type' internet conference, after the inconclusive meeting between the latter three last Friday. This 'internet' conference ended with all four participants agreeing on a face-to-face conference to take place, once again in Minsk, this coming Wednesday (11/2/2015), to try to revive the dead Minsk protocols of September last year.

Merkel arriving in Washington

 After this 'Skype-conference' yesterday, Merkel then jetted over to Washington to meet today with President Obama, and to fill him in on what transpired at the meeting last Friday, and the 'Skype-conference' yesterday.

Sergei Lavrov

As we recall, that dyed-in-the-wool Soviet foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, stood in front of the assembled delegates at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday (7/2/2015) and delivered a 45 minute speech, during which he was booed and heckled as he tried to rewrite history in favour of Putin's current mind-set of events past and present. 

As Julian Borger reported,

"The mood at a meeting of leaders and foreign ministers at the annual Munich Security Conference was acrimonious. The Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, was jeered and booed, when he denied Moscow was providing military support to the rebels." (The Guardian : Sunday 8 February 2015) (my emphasis)

Almost immediately after his speech, RT scrambled to 'weaponise' it  by ensuring that the jeers and booes were eliminated from their in-house interpreting of the full speech, which they almost immediately televised. In this RT TV production, Lavrov's voice was powerfully overlaid by that of the 'interpreter', to the extent that one could practically not make out what Lavrov was saying. Even more disconcerting, at the beginning of this excerpt the 'interpreter' says,

" ... and the leaders of Russia, France, and Germany ...."

and yet Lavrov DOES NOT mention these countries. But see and listen for yourselves.

The complete RT version of his speech can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWsR_nkxfAY : This is what Putin's propaganda mouthpiece is spreading all over the world.

Contrast this RT propaganda with an excerpt of Merkel speaking at this conference, with at conference simultaneous interpreting. 

 

Following on from the Munich Security Conference, President Obama and Angela Merkel will today be meeting in Washington. This meeting has, as its backdrop, what was said by both US Secretary of State John Kerry and US Vice-President John Biden at the Munich Security Conference. Both were forceful in proclaiming their support for Ukraine, and in confronting head-on what Putin is really doing in eastern Ukraine, as well as his trampling over international law when he annexed Ukarinian Crimea.

 US Vice-president John Biden at the Munich Security Conference

  

 US Secretary of State John Kerry at the Munich Security Conference

The stand taken by these two men could not have been lost on Putin and his Kremlin cohorts.

More importantly, whilst Obama and Merkel may both agree on not arming Ukraine with defensive weapons against those that Russia has flooded into the areas controlled by his proxies and his Russian soldiers, the words of Biden and Kerry cannot be undone. 

This is Obama's "Kennedy moment". For Obama the clock is rapidly ticking down towards,

" ... the deadline ..  for the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 to come into FULL effect on the 16th February 2015. This Act mandates Obama into making a decision on sending military hardware to Ukraine since the Act includes the following:

(i) Provisions for training, defense articles, anti-tank weapons, anti-armor weapons, crew weapons, ammunition, counter-artillery radar, fire control, range diner, tactical troop-operated surveillance drones, and other equipment pursuant to the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act – Total of $350,000,000 over three years" (blog entry: 3rd Feb. 2015)

US Secretary of Defence, Chuck Hagel, rather neatly expressed the predicament that Obama now finds himself in. Increase sanctions against Russia, or bite the bullet and supply Ukraine with defensive weaponry.

US Secretary of Defence Chuck Hagel

No doubt Obama is fervently hoping that the forthcoming meeting on Wednesday between Merkel, Poroshenko, Hollande, and Putin, will pull this chesnut out of the fire for him.

But for this to be done, Putin will have to be appeased with concessions that, under the circumstances, Poroshenko simply will not agree with.

Again, I draw the reader's attention to the geopolitical mind-set of Putin. Putin cannot simply scupper the idea of "Novorossiya", the very backbone of his annexation of Ukrainian Crimea and his invasion of eastern Ukraine. The 'airwaves of Russia' have been saturated with this geopolitical aim for months on end.

For Putin, even the mere thought of abandoning this aim of his must seem to him like committing suicide. And Putin is simply not ready to commit 'political' suicide.

(to be continued)

Putin standing at the abyss of igniting total war (7 Feb 2015)

It was to be expected that the talks yesterday between Putin, Angela Merkel, and Hollande would fail, even though Merkel and Hollande,

" ... [offered] Putin federalization and non-alignment of Ukraine in exchange for peace .." (Unian Information Agency : 06.02.201)

"German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung earlier wrote that there was the possibility of concessions being made to the Russian-backed militants, including territorial ones." (ibid Unian) (my emphasis)

                Putin                               Merkel                               Hollande

Now, even Francoise Hollande has finally come to the realization that,

"....the consequences of [the continual] fighting [in eastern Ukraine are] serious. "If we fail to find a lasting peace agreement, we know the scenario perfectly well... it is called war."" (James Reynolds : BBC News Europe : 7 February 2015) (my emphasis)

Speaking today at the Munich Security Conference, Merkel simply had to concede that trying to fill the FAILED Minsk Agreement with life is simply uncertain. As she says in the BBC midday News Broadcast today, Sat. 7 February 2015, 

"..I'm saying it's uncertain whether the talks will be crowned with success ..."

BBC midday News  7 Feb. 2015

 

More critically, it is finally dawning upon many that inceasing sanctions will simply embolden Putin to accelerate the flow of Russian soldiers and arms into eastern Ukraine to continue to extend the Ukrainian territory under the control of his proxies and his invading army.

Thus even NATO is now having to consider arming the Ukrainians.

General Philip Breedlove

"NATO's top military commander, U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove signalled that he now wants the alliance to consider sending weapons to Ukraine."( Stephen Brown and Noah Barkin : Reuters : Sat Feb 7, 2015)
 
NATO is now moving closer to the position of the US viz. that it is becoming more and more inevitable that Ukraine now needs to be supplied with sophisticated military equipment to counter the Russian equipment flooding into eastern Ukraine.

Many in the EU are now coming to the conclusion that,

"Putin is ...  a reckless gambler who calls bluffs and takes risks, and is inscrutable, paranoid and unpredictable. Trying to work out what he wants is guesswork." (Ian Traynor : The Guardian : Friday 6 February 2015) (my emphasis)

If, as also reported by Ian Traynor,

Carl Bildt

"Carl Bildt, the former Swedish foreign minister, said a war between Russia and the west was now quite conceivable."

[is] it therefore any wonder that the Europeans now sound scared? (ibid Ian Traynor) (my emphasis)

Senator Lyndsey Graham

U.S. Senator Lyndsey Graham seems to have the measure of the fear of Putin now being expressed by many EU politicians.

"Speaking after Merkel at the Munich Security Conference today, U.S. Senator Lyndsey Graham, a Republican hawk, praised the chancellor for her engagement in the crisis but said it was time for her to wake up to the reality of what he called Moscow's aggressions.

"At the end of the day, to our European friends, this is not working. You can go to Moscow until you turn blue in the face. Stand up to what is clearly a lie and a danger," Graham said.

He accused Merkel of turning her back on a struggling democracy by rejecting down Kiev's request for arms. "That is exactly what you are doing," he said." (ibid Stephen Brown and Noah Barkin) (my emphasis)

The sheer contempt that Putin has for this sudden flurry of diplomacy in the EU, regarding the current situation in eastern Ukraine, is signified by the fact that,

• "Russian President Vladimir Putin marked the one-year anniversary of the start of the Sochi Winter Olympics [today] (The Associated Press -As reported in The Telegraph-Georgia : February 7, 2015)
• Putin is demanding that a large tract of eastern Ukraine, taken by force by his separatist proxies in recent weeks, be granted internationally licensed autonomy and that a new frontline be recognised as a basis for a putative ceasefire. (ibid Ian Traynor)

Perhaps an even more significant indicator of Putin's contempt for both the EU and the US is the fact that,

"Eastern Ukraine has become a testing ground for Russia's new military capabilities." ( Keir Giles : BBC News Europe : 6 February 2015) (my emphasis)

A rebel Strela-10 air defence system on the streets of Donetsk

A rebel Grad rocket system is deployed at a cemetery

                             Only Russian soldiers can operate these sophisticated systems!

Merkel, Hollande, and especially Italian PM Matteo Renzi, even though they are members of NATO, are manouvering themselves into a position of 'neutrality' should a war between Russia and the west be set alight by Putin, as Carl Bildt speculates may happen. Putin's aim of destroying the EU would then have been successful.

Furthermore, the rift between the US and these central EU countries would become unbridgeable. 

In one fell swoop Putin will create a reality out of the geopolitical dream that he shares with his Rasputin, Alexander Dugin viz.
"The new Eurasian empire [that] will be constructed on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us. This common civilizational impulse will be the basis of a political and strategic union." (Wikipedia) (my emphasis)

 
Is this what Putin has in mind? 
Is it this that is determining his current state of mind and shaping his actions?
Unlike Khruschev, will Putin actually press the 'nuclear' button? 

Or will he, at the eleventh hour, step away from the abyss of total war, as that dyed-in-the-wool Soviet foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, hinted at yesterday. (cf. BBC News Video above)



(to be continued)

Putin, Merkel, and Hollande meeting to-day in Moscow (6 Feb. 2015)

When Wolfgang Schäuble, German Finance Minister, last year compared Putin to Hitler,

Wolfgang Schäuble

" ... on the basis that both men forcibly seized whole chunks of other countries’ territories based solely upon the utterly illegitimate predicate of ethnic comradeship " (James Kirchick : FP : February 5, 2015) (my emphasis)

he was rounded upon

" ...  by all sectors of German media and politics as an uncouth barbarian trampling upon Germany’s sacred debt to honor its wartime history. Their number included no less a figure than the Chancellor [Angela Merkel] herself ..." (ibid James Kirchick) (my emphasis)

This German reaction to the truism that Wolfgang Schäuble expressed stems, primarily, from the susceptibility of the German public to Russia's propaganda machine because of a misplaced sense of guilt towards Moscow.

But, as Yale Professor of History, Timothy Snyder, has pointed out,

"The vast majority of Ukrainians who fought in the war did so in the uniform of the Red Army. More Ukrainians were killed fighting the Wehrmacht than American, British, and French soldiers -- combined. In Germany these basic facts are invisible because the Red Army is seen falsely as a Russian army, an identification insisted upon by the propaganda of today’s Russia." (Frankfurter Allgemeine : Freitag, 06. Februar 2015) (my emphasis)

This salutory fact of the Ukrainians that died during WWII seems to have been somewhat lost on the German public and, more particularly, on Merkel herself.

Those Germans who rounded upon Wolfgang Schäuble for simply telling the truth should have a sense of guilt about what they did to the Ukrainians during WWII, instead of just lumping them together with Russian soldiers by virtue of the fact that the Ukrainian soldiers also wore Russian uniforms.

And today, Angela Merkel carries with her that misplaced sense of guilt towards Moscow when she and Hollande will meet Putin today to carve out a so-called peace deal that will be in favour of Putin and against the interests of Ukraine. Yet again has Putin's trojan Minsk proposals succeeded in expanding the growing gulf between the US and the EU on how to support Ukraine against the Russian army invading their country.

 This sudden flurry of diplomatic 'urgency' on the part of Merkel and Hollande has, in no doubt, being brought about by the possible imminent supply of arms to Ukraine by President Obama.

BBC News Broadcast 5th February 2015

 Senator McCain, in particular, is under no illusions that without supplying Ukraine with the necessary military equipment with which to confront the expanding Russian military presence in eastern Ukraine, Putin will ultimately be able to have his land-bridge between Russia and 'annexed' Ukrainian Crimea, together with annexing eastern Ukraine itself.

BBC News Broadcast 5th February 2015

 

Mindful of how Putin is militarising eastern Ukraine, and is poised to fully invade Ukraine with his large army camped on the border between Russia and Ukraine, NATO has created a 'spearhead' defence force to protect the vulnerable NATO countries of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Rumania, and Bulgaria against Russian forces. It is the biggest defence reinforcement of NATO since the Cold War.

Yet even with respect to NATO, Merkel seems to be singing from the same hymn-sheet as Putin.

"Not only has Merkel opposed NATO supplying weapons to Ukraine, she has also gone so far as to oppose the stationing of NATO forces further east on the territory of the alliance’s newer members so as to reassure them in the face of the new Russian aggression. To justify this stance, she has formulated a dubious interpretation of a clause in the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations, which stated that NATO would not station “permanent” forces in the new member countries in the “current and foreseeable security environment.”" (ibid James Kirchick)

If Merkel is dancing to the tune of the German public's wide and deep sympathy for Russia (Russland-Versteher, or “Russia understander), then Hollande is simply marching to the tune of the Socialist and Radical Left Party in France. After all, it was they who nominated him as their candidate in the 2012 French presidential elections.

Where the sympathy of the Germans for Russians stem from WWII, the French have always had a starry-eyed view of Russia since the times of Catherine the Great. Added to which, of course, there is all that trade between France and Russia.

Thus, the meeting to-day in Moscow between Putin, Merkel, and Hollande is really a sort of 'fraternal meeting' between 'comrades in arms'.  Putin will play on Merkel's guilt, and on Hollande wanting to get those billions for those warships sold to Russia, and that are still hanging about in a French port, thanks to sanctions.

                Putin                                   Merkel                            Hollande

But what about Putin himself?

Enter Russia's Ultra Nationalist, Alexander Dugin, who functions as Putin's Rasputin.

Alexander Dugin

Putin's mind-set will be encompassed by Dugin's philosophy, which was the driving conceptual force behind his initiative for the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation.

Dugin's philosophy,

" ... focuses on the restoration of the Russian Empire through the unification of Russian-speaking territories, which roughly corresponds to the former Soviet republics, such as Georgia and Ukraine, and unification with Russian-speaking territories, especially eastern Ukraine and Crimea" (Wikipedia)

With this in mind what, exactly, does Merkel and Hollande think that they will achieve at today's meeting with Putin? A ceasefire in eastern Ukraine? A handover of Crimea back to Ukraine?

As the old saying goes, "Pigs will fly".

(to be continued)

Will Putin or Obama blink first (5 Feb. 2015)

Finally the world seems to be waking up to what Putin is doing in Ukraine. Putin has escalated the war between Ukraine and his proxies and Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine to a point of no return. Putin is banking heavily on the fact that President Obama will not supply Ukraine with lethal arms since Obama simply does not have the stomach that Kennedy had in his stand-off with Krushchev,

"[during] a 13-day confrontation in October 1962 between the United States and the Soviet Union over Soviet ballistic missiles deployed in Cuba." (Wikipedia)

Like President Obama, Merkel also continues to intone her mantra about the Minsk protocols and a 'diplomatic' solution, even though she admits that,

" .... [diplomacy] does not lead to results as quickly as we may like" (cf. video below)

What both Merkel and Obama are really saying to the people of Ukraine is that they will have to endure Putin's proxies and Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine killing and maiming them, and that the rest of Ukraine will simply have to put up with dire privations during this cold winter as Putin escalates his invasion of their country.

Meanwhile, the 'fragrant' Mogherini simply mouths political platitudes for public consumption whilst, basically, 'not giving a fig' about Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

This is the statement that she released yesterday (4 Feb. 2015).

"The spiral of ever increasing violence in Eastern Ukraine needs to stop. The fighting provoked by the continued separatist offensive, notably around Debaltseve, is causing great human suffering and undermines all efforts aimed at a political solution. The shelling of civilians, wherever it happens, is a grave violation of international humanitarian law. Artillery should immediately be withdrawn from residential areas.
Residents of Ukraine's Donbas strive to flee the region and the humanitarian crisis continues to worsen dramatically in the coldest period of the year. Civilians need to be able to leave the conflict zone safely. I join the call by the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office on all actors in and around the Debaltseve area to establish a local temporary truce for a minimum of three days, taking immediate effect." (European Union External Action : 04/02/2015) (my emphasis)

It would seem that NATO is taking Putin's escalating invasion of Ukraine very seriously indeed.

"Nato is set to announce details of a plan to bolster the alliance's military presence in Eastern Europe in response to continued fighting in Ukraine.

The bloc's chief  [Jens Stoltenberg] says it will be the biggest reinforcement of its collective defence since the end of the Cold War." (BBC News Europe : 5 February 2015) (my emphasis)

Furthermore, Jens Stoltenberg said that,

Jens Stoltenberg

" I very much underline that this is something we do because we have to adapt our forces when we see that the world is changing"

"Nato will also reveal plans for a network of small command centres in Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, and Bulgaria.

The move is being seen as a potential deterrent against any Russian threat to the Baltic states or other bloc members should the crisis in Ukraine spin out of control. " (ibid BBC News Europe) (my emphasis)

On Jan 7, 2015, Stratfor Global Intelligence wrote that,

"As the standoff between Russia and the West evolved, the Baltic countries and Poland threw their full support behind Ukraine. Throughout the crisis, they have been the most assertive countries in challenging Russia's position in the former Soviet periphery."   (my emphasis) unlike many other EU countries who have preferred to sit on the sidelines while Putin invaded Ukraine.

The 'diplomatic' shuttling now seems to be hotting up somewhat.

 Today, Secretary of State John Kerry plans to meet Mr. Poroshenko, Prime Minister Arseniy P. Yatsenyuk and Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin. (Michael R. Gordon : New York Times : 5 Feb. 2015)

Just as John Kerry arrives today in Kiev for talks with Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, and Klimko,

"Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and President François Hollande of France are [today also]  traveling to Kiev [to] hold talks with President Petro O. Poroschenko of Ukraine, officials from the two countries said." (ibid Michael R. Gordon)

            Angela Merkel                      Francois Hollande

Furthermore that,

"On Friday, the French and German leaders are to continue to Moscow, where they are to meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to discuss the situation in Ukraine." (ibid Michael Gordon)

The question is,

"Will the next two days of  'frantic' diplomatic meetings in Moscow, Kiev, and Brussels manage to change the current mind-set of Putin?" Or are these meetings simply yet another result of Putin's 'maskirovka' strategy to dismember Ukraine.

We await to see what happens.

(to be continued)

Putin readies to storm Ukraine (4 Feb 2015)

At the end of last month, Fareed Zakaria interviewed President Obama for CNN. The interview ranged over a wide number of topics, including US and Russian relations. In this part of the interview, President Obama says, " ... Yanukovych then fleeing .. after we had brokered a deal to transition power in Ukraine..." (CNN : January 31, 2015)

This remark, about an internationally brokered deal to resolve last year's Ukrainian crisis, was seized upon by that dyed-in-the-wool-Soviet foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, as 'absolute proof' that,

"... Washington was involved in a "coup" against Ukraine's Moscow-backed president." (RFE/RL : February 2, 2015)

Subsequently, thanks to Putin's propaganda mouthpiece RT, Lavrov's 'deliberate' extraction of this one remark from this interview, without acknowledging that the deal mentioned by Obama referred to a deal arrived at by an international group, not by the US alone, has now landed on the internet.

Thus,  "after WE had brokered a deal .." has now become the US alone. 

This is a prime example of the weaponization of information by Putin. Russian maskirovka in action.

Obama interview about US-Russia relations (CNN)

The RT version

What Lavrov's 'spin' on Obama's interview seems to indicate is that Putin is building up his propaganda 'armaments' in readiness for the invasion of a huge number of Russian soldiers into eastern Ukraine, as the deadline nears for the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 to come into FULL effect on the 16th February 2015. This Act mandates Obama into making a decision on sending military hardware to Ukraine since the Act includes the following:

(i) Provisions for training, defense articles, anti-tank weapons, anti-armor weapons, crew weapons, ammunition, counter-artillery radar, fire control, range diner, tactical troop-operated surveillance drones, and other equipment pursuant to the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act – Total of $350,000,000 over three years

(ii) Legally mandates the President to submit a timeline how defensive aid will actually get to Ukraine (George Barros : Euromaidan Press : 17 Dec. 2014)

Supplementing his build-up of 'propaganda' to justify the impending flood of Russian soldiers into eastern Ukraine, Putin is now demanding that,

"Ukraine should repay the $3 billion loan because Russia needs that money to fight the economic crisis that's currently ravaging the nation". (Elena Holodny: Business Insider UK : Feb. 3, 2015)

And anticipating the impending mass invasion of Russian soldiers, under the guise of a 'mobilization' of forces in the rebel held areas of eastern Ukraine, 

Arseniy Yatseniuk : Ukraine Prime Minister

"The Ukrainian government ordered the termination of Points 1 and 5 of the list of documents permitting Russian citizens to enter and exit Ukraine, as well stay in Ukraine and travel around the country's territory. Starting from March 1, 2015 Russian citizens will not be able to use internal passports or birth certificates for Russian citizens under the age of 14 to enter Ukraine." (Russia Beyond the Headlines (RBtH) : February 3, 2015 Interfax) (my emphasis) 

And while bombs are raining from the rebel and Russian held areas in and around Debaltseve, Angela Merkel is still clinging to the outdated Minsk protocols of last year, like a drowning person desperately clinging to a straw, as the people of Debaltseve are removed out of harms way by the Ukrainian authorities. ( Aleksandar Vasovic : Yenakieve, Ukraine : Reuters: Mon Feb 2, 2015)

 "The outskirts of Yenakieve and Vuhlegirsk, both on the main highway to Debaltseve, were under heavy artillery fire as rebel multiple rocket launchers and artillery pummelled the positions of Ukrainian troops in the area." (ibid  Aleksandar Vasovic )

Debaltseve

(to be continued)

Is Putin readying his army for the final push? (3rd Feb. 2015)

Yesterday, Shaun Walker in Kiev, Alec Luhn in Moscow and Spencer Ackerman in Washington report that,

     Shaun Walker             Alec Luhn          Spencer Ackerman

"The high-stakes poker game over east Ukraine continued on Monday, with US officials floating the idea of sending lethal military assistance to the government in Kiev, while Russia-backed separatists announced a plan to mobilise a 100,000-strong army." (The Guardian : Monday 2 February 2015) (my emphasis)

Furthermore that,

Angela Merkel

"The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, has taken a tougher line on Putin in recent months and has come out strongly in support of sanctions against Russia, but on Monday unequivocally ruled out military assistance.
“Germany will not support Ukraine with guns and weapons,” said Merkel, speaking in Budapest. “We are putting all our bets on sanctions and doing our best to find a diplomatic solution.” (ibid Walker, Luhn, Spencer) (my emphasis)

Sen. Menendez

What their article does not mention is that on the 16th September 2014, Sen. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ] sponsored the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 that, inter alia, allowed but did not require the US to send military aid to Ukraine. This bill was signed into law by President Obama in December 2014.

However this Bill has, as yet, not been fully enacted.

Why? Because it contains the following viz.

President Obama

(i) Provisions for training, defense articles, anti-tank weapons, anti-armor weapons, crew weapons, ammunition, counter-artillery radar, fire control, range diner, tactical troop-operated surveillance drones, and other equipment pursuant to the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act – Total of $350,000,000 over three years

(ii) Legally mandates the President to submit a timeline how defensive aid will actually get to Ukraine (George Barros : Euromaidan Press : 17 Dec. 2014)

This Bill comes into FULL effect on the 16th February 2015, and this is what the current brouhaha about the US sending military aid to Ukraine is all about.  But Obama still has to give the green light for the provision of military aid to Ukraine.

Putin

Putin knew what could happen on the 16th February when the Ukraine Freedom Support Act, signed by Obama, comes into full effect, and pre-empted the possibility of military aid arriving into Ukraine from the US by recently escalating the war between Ukraine and Russia. The armaments and Russian soldiers that have practically swarmed into eastern Ukraine over the last few weeks is testimony to the fact that Putin and his military men are hell bent on taking Mariupol and Debaltseve so that Crimea can have its land-bridge into Russia, and eastern Ukraine can then fully be incorporated into Russia.

And it is with this aim in mind that Putin's puppet proxy in eastern Ukraine recently declared that he will be mobilising a 100,000 strong army allegedly from the current inhabitants of the areas in eastern Ukraine that they and the Russian army now control. This mobilisation from those still in eastern Ukraine, and currently under the control of Putin's army and proxies, is a TOTAL impossibility. Are they, like Hitler did during his last days, also going to mobilise children?

What this really means is that Putin is threatening to send 100,000 RUSSIAN SOLDIERS into eastern Ukraine if Obama sends military aid to Kiev.

And standing on the sidelines is Angela Merkel, practically giving Putin the green light to annex eastern Ukraine as he wishes, thus dismembering Ukraine.

   

   Pegida demonstration in Dresden

Her constant mantra about 'diplomatic' solutions (read: the scrapped Minsk protocols) and 'sanctions' being the ONLY way to defuse the current situation in eastern Ukraine and Crimea, a situation that Putin himself has created, is beginning to ring rather hollow. Her main current pre-occupation is in dealing with Greece, the Euro, and the rise of Pegida that directly threatens her political position.

Therefore what we now have is:

• Obama pacing up and down not knowing what to do on the 16th February when the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 comes into effect and he has to decide on sending military aid to Ukraine
• Merkel sitting on her hands over Ukraine whilst panicking about the potential demise of the Euro and the rise of Pegida
• and Putin, with Patriarch Kirill by his side, simply itching to give the order to his generals to send those 100,000 Russian soldiers into eastern Ukraine.

A YOUNG UKRAINIAN GIRL AT MAIDAN

(to be continued)