In their defence of Trump, are Republicans aware that they are also defending Putin?

When  Trump "repeatedly pursued business deals in Russia since 1987, and sometimes travelled there to explore potential business opportunities", and "..in 2008 his son Donald Trump Jr. said that Russia was an important source of money for the Trump businesses", (Wikipedia) little did Putin then know that his FSB surveillance of  Trump had collected salacious details on a big fish ... the future President of the US, Donald Trump.

These salacious details gathered by Putin, as revealed in the dossier of  David Steele, have always haunted Trump. So much so, that one can now understand Trump's fear of 'getting on the wrong side' of Putin since Putin can, by simply revealing these salacious details, put an ignominious and abrupt end to Trump's presidency.

And so it is that these 'salacious' details are now beginning to be publicly mentioned, by none other than Trump himself in a revealed one-on-one conversation with former FBI director, James Comey, as the Senate Intelligence Committee continues its investigation into Putin's collusion with Trump and his cohorts during the 2016 US presidential elections.

Today James Comey will be appearing before the US Senate Intelligence Committee, and the already publicly released details of Comey's conversations with Donald Trump will come under severe scrutiny.

Today, the psychological pressure that Putin is exerting on Trump to have the US sanctions against himself, his 'siloviki', and his private 'slush fund Russian bank', Vnesheconombank, removed, will be revealed.

What will also be revealed, as Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson explains, is the fact the the Trump administration, just like Putin and his Kremlin clan, is being run like a Mafia Organization, an organization that demands loyalty.

Trump however, in not above the Rule of Law in the US, nor the US Constitution, something that he simply fails to understand.

How he must wish that he had the same power as Putin, where the so-called Russian Rule of Law simply does not exist, and where Putin IS the law.

The fact that Trump wanted former FBI director, James Comey, to drop his investigation into the many conversations between Russian US ambassador, Sergei Kislyak, and  Mike Flynn, (left: Flynn and Kislyak) both during and after the 2016 US presidential election, signifies that Trump, himself, must have know that the central theme of those conversations between Flynn and Kislyak was the dropping of  the US sanctions that was instituted because of Putin's illegal annexation of Ukrainian Crimea, and his ongoing war with Ukraine in the Donbas.

This was the 'payback' expected by Putin of Trump for getting Trump into the White House.

The scarlet thread of Maidan, that has wrapped Putin in sanctions, and that has wrapped Trump in the nightmare of his salacious cavortings in Russia being publicly revealed, as by his own 'denial' of those cavorting to James Comey, cannot be easily escaped from by either Putin nor Trump.

James Comey's testimony before the US Senate Intelligence Committee today will bring out the most tortuous legal defence of Trump by his Republican defenders in both the US Congress and Senate.

The $64 question is,

"How far will Republican Senators and Congress men and women go to defend Trump in the face of ongoing revelations about his attempt to obstruct Justice?"

In their defence of Trump, are Republicans aware that they are also defending Putin?

(to be continued)

Putin's nightmare is now the likely possibililty of a Mike Pence presidency.

Unian reported on the 4th June that,

"Russia's hybrid military forces attacked Ukrainian army positions in Donbas 58 times in the past 24 hours, with two Ukrainian soldiers reported as killed in action (KIA) and five as wounded in action (WIA), according to the press service of the Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO) Headquarters.
.....
The largest number of violations was recorded in the Mariupol sector, namely there were 36 militant attacks." (UNIAN : 4th June, 2017) (my emphasis)

This follows on from,

"Russia's hybrid military forces attacked Ukrainian army positions in Donbas 19 times on June 3, with one Ukrainian soldier reported as wounded in action (WIA), according to the press service of the Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO) Headquarters." (ibid Unian)

This 'stealth' escalation by Putin of his war with Ukraine comes just after the,

"Deputy foreign ministers from Germany, France, Ukraine and Russia [met on Tuesday May 30th, 2017] in Berlin [...] to discuss the Ukraine crisis in the Normandy group format ..." (Thomas Escritt and Paul Carrel : Reuters: Mon May 29, 2017) (my emphasis)

The main item on their agenda was,

" ... to review the current situation on the ground with regard to the cease-fire and with regard to all other commitments under the Minsk agreements," German government spokesman Martin Schaefer told a regular news conference. (RFERL :  May 29, 2017) (my emphasis)

Which raises the interesting question.

Why "Deputy Foreign Ministers" and not the current Normandy group of Foreign ministers? 

(Klimkin [Ukraine] Le Drian [France]  Lavrov [Russia]  Hartmut [Germany])

Is this because 'the Trump elephant in the room' of ANY discussions about the full implementation of the Minsk2 proposals simply cannot be ignored, especially by Klimkin, Le Drian, or Hartmut, and that their efforts are now focussed on what is happening to Trump as his administration, and himself, begins to reach a stage of near total meltdown? 

Furthermore, is Putin's current 'stealth' escalation of his war with Ukraine yet another arrogant signal by Putin to Klimkin, Le Drian, and Hartmut that they can no longer depend on the US to support their diplomatic efforts to get him to honour his commitments under the Minsk agreements?

As Henry Farrell recently reported,

"Merkel on Sunday declared a new chapter in U.S.-European relations after contentious meetings with President Trump last week, saying that Europe “really must take our fate into our own hands.” (Washington Post : May 28) (my emphasis)

On 2 June I wrote in my blog entry that,

"Just as Putin has now publicly humiliated Trump, James Comey's appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee [this coming Thursday] will pull the rug out from under the feet of Trump.  

But Putin himself is now also panicking because the scarlet thread of Maidan is inexorably dragging Trump towards towards the dock of impeachment. 

For both Trump and Putin, speed is now of the essence to get the US sanctions unilaterally lifted." (blog: June 2, 2017)

I would expect that Merkel, Macron, Poroshenko, and Putin will be anxiously watching what former FBI director James Comey (left) has to say in front of the US Senate Intelligence Committee this coming Thursday.

Crucially, the questions that the members of the US Senate Intelligence Committee will ask Comey to answer under oath could determine the ultimate fate of the Trump administration.

Every word and syllable of Comey's testimony will especially be nervously anticipated by Trump and Putin.

Part 1

Part 2

(full MSNBC video)

Is Putin, by 'stealthily escalating' his war with Ukraine, hedging his bets against a possible negative outcome for himself and his 'siloviki' after James Comey's testimony in front of the US Senate Intelligence Committee this coming Thursday?

Will Comey's testimony put the final break on any lifting of US sanctions against Putin and his Kremlin clique, sanctions that were put in place because of Putin's illegal invasion and annexation of Ukrainian Crimea, and his war with Ukraine in the Donbas?

Critically, Vice President Mike Pence, at the Munich Security Conference in February of this year, vowed that,

".. the United States will “hold Russia accountable” even as President Trump searches for new common ground with Moscow at the start of his presidency.
......
Pence said the U.S. would demand that Russia honor a 2015 peace deal agreed upon in Minsk, Belarus, to end violence in eastern Ukraine between government forces and Russia-backed separatists." (CBS News : Feb 18, 2017) (my emphasis)

Putin's nightmare is now the likely possibililty of a Mike Pence presidency.

(to be continued)

The largest number of violations was recorded in the Mariupol sector, namely there were 36 militant attacks.

Read more on UNIAN: https://www.unian.info/war/1957826-ukraine-reports-58-enemy-attacks-2-kias-5-wias-in-last-day.html

Russia's hybrid military forces attacked Ukrainian army positions in Donbas 58 times in the past 24 hours, with two Ukrainian soldiers reported as killed in action (KIA) and five as wounded in action (WIA), according to the press service of the Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO) Headquarters. The largest number of violations was recorded in the Mariupol sector, namely there were 36 militant attacks.

Read more on UNIAN: https://www.unian.info/war/1957826-ukraine-reports-58-enemy-attacks-2-kias-5-wias-in-last-day.html

Russia's hybrid military forces attacked Ukrainian army positions in Donbas 58 times in the past 24 hours, with two Ukrainian soldiers reported as killed in action (KIA) and five as wounded in action (WIA), according to the press service of the Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO) Headquarters. The largest number of violations was recorded in the Mariupol sector, namely there were 36 militant attacks.

Read more on UNIAN: https://www.unian.info/war/1957826-ukraine-reports-58-enemy-attacks-2-kias-5-wias-in-last-day.html

Russia's hybrid military forces attacked Ukrainian army positions in Donbas 58 times in the past 24 hours, with two Ukrainian soldiers reported as killed in action (KIA) and five as wounded in action (WIA), according to the press service of the Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO) Headquarters. The largest number of violations was recorded in the Mariupol sector, namely there were 36 militant attacks.

Read more on UNIAN: https://www.unian.info/war/1957826-ukraine-reports-58-enemy-attacks-2-kias-5-wias-in-last-day.html

President Macron should take care that the scarlet thread of Maidan does not also entwine him.

On Friday, May 26-2017,

"European Council President Donald Tusk urged Group of Seven leaders on Friday to stick to their sanctions policy on Russia over the Ukraine crisis, a day after a senior U.S. official said Washington had no position on the issue.  
...
"A solution to the conflict can only be reached with the full implementation of the Minsk accords," Tusk said ahead of the summit that gathers the leaders of the United States, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Japan and Canada." (John Irish : Reuters : Fri May 26, 2017) (my emphasis)

Three days before this meeting of the G7 leaders, Charles Kupchan wrote that,

"Since taking office, Donald Trump has turned his back on Ukraine, largely ignoring Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its aggression in Ukraine’s eastern region of Donbass. The costs of neglect are high. The conflict in Ukraine’s east is continuing to claim lives — some 10,000 so far — and could easily escalate .. " (Financial Times : May 23, 2017) (my emphasis)

Then, on the 29th May-2017, French President Macron and Vladimir Putin had a press conference during which Macron said,

"..About the situation in Ukraine .. We have mentioned this dossier in detail and we have talked about the so-called Minsk process .... I think we could say that it is our intention to hold a new Normandy format round of exchanges with Germany and the Ukraine and to have a complete shared analysis of the situation .. " (Full Video of press conference) (my emphasis)

Putin, however, merely mentioned the word "Ukraine" in passing, preferring to extol the virtues of the increasing trade relations between Russia and France.

In the May 20 talks between Merkel and Putin at Sochi,

"The German Chancellor said that a stable cease-fire has not been established and the Minsk agreements have not been fully implemented by now. She said she will discuss with Poroshenko further work within the framework of the Minsk agreements and the Norman format." (Censor Net : 20-5-2017) (my emphasis)

Now, as reported by Thomas Escritt and Paul Carrel,

"Deputy foreign ministers from Germany, France, Ukraine and Russia will meet in Berlin on Tuesday to discuss the Ukraine crisis in the Normandy group format, a German Foreign Ministry spokesman said.

The Normandy contact group was designed to broker a peace process in rebel-held regions in eastern parts of Ukraine.

"This is to review the current situation on the ground with regard to the ceasefire and with regard to all other commitments under the Minsk agreements," spokesman Martin Schaefer told a regular government news conference." (Reuters : Mon May 29, 2017)

Xavier Moreau (right), founder of the Stratpol Think Tank, in an interview with Putin's mouthpiece, Sputnik, stated that,
 
"It’s clear that if France says no to sanctions they will not be extended or they will be kept by certain countries on a unilateral basis. But there will be no sanctions at a European level. Of course, Germany will not keep sanctions against Russia if France removes them, because Berlin doesn’t want to lose Russia’s market to Paris," Moreau suggested.
Furthermore, the analyst pointed out that Macron can use the possible removal of anti-Russian sanctions as an instrument to bring peace to Ukraine. (Sputnik : 31.05.2017) (my emphasis)

Can President Macron, the former investment banker at Rothschild & Cie Banque, ignore the clamour of French businessmen to continue to rapidly expand their economic links with Putin's Russia, whilst Merkel's businessmen still have to suffer under Germany's sanctions regime against Putin?

Both President Macron and Angela Merkel must be keeping a rather close eye of events in the US.

If Trump manages to lift US sanctions against Russia then following quickly in his footsteps will be Macron since he has no prior political investment in the Minsk2 protocols, and since he has publicly stated that,

" I think we could say that it is our intention to hold a new Normandy format round of exchanges with Germany and the Ukraine and to have a complete shared analysis of the situation .. " (cf. above video clip of Macron)

But the chips continue to be stacked against Trump.

 MSNBC June 1, 2017

As the case against Trump continues to mount, President Macron will find it near impossible to unilaterally lift the French sanctions against Putin if the US sanctions remain intact. 

As I commented in my last blog entry (2-06-2017)

"For both Trump and Putin, speed is now of the essence to get the US sanctions unilaterally lifted. "

Just as the scarlet thread of Maidan has entwined both Trump and Putin together, it now seems as though President Macron himself is now struggling to ensure that he, too, does not become entwined by the scarlet thread of Maidan.

(to be continued)

For both Trump and Putin, speed is now of the essence to get the US sanctions unilaterally lifted.

In yesterday's blog entry I wrote that,
 
"Already Trump is on the verge of ending the sanctions imposed upon Putin by former president Obama because of Putin's meddling in the US presidential elections.

Is this the thin end of Trump's wedge to lift those US sanctions imposed upon Putin because of his annexation of Ukrainian Crimea and his ongoing war with Ukraine?

Will Trump now use the excuse of distancing himself from Europe to also get Putin off the sanctions hook?" (blog entry June 1, 2017)


It now transpires that the Trump administration tried to unilaterally lift the sanctions on Putin and his cronies within weeks of taking over the White House.. (Brian Williams Report: June 1, 2017: 11.01 pm ET)

It would now seem that Trump and his cronies in the White House are somewhat at 'panic stations' to get these sanctions lifted as soon as possible, especially in light of the impending appearance of James Comey, former FBI director, at the Senate Intelligence Committee next week.

Even more significant is the fact that,

"Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested "patriotic" Russian citizens might be engaged in hacking.

Such individuals might be joining "the justified fight against those speaking ill of Russia," he said.
Like "artists" who get up and paint all day, he added, hackers spend their day attacking adversaries." (BBC News : 1 June 2017) (my emphasis)

By publicly undermining Trump's constant refrain that Russian hackers were not responsible for the hacking of Hilary Clinton and the DNC during the US presidential elections, is Putin signalling to Trump that he could also publicly release all the dirt he has on Trump unless Trump quickly gets rid of ALL US sanctions against him and his cronies? (cf: Guardian : Steele Confidential Report)

Just as Putin has now publicly humiliated Trump, James Comey's appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee next week will pull the rug out from under the feet of Trump.  

But Putin himself is now also panicking because the scarlet thread of Maidan is inexorably dragging Trump towards towards the dock of impeachment. 

For both Trump and Putin, speed is now of the essence to get the US sanctions unilaterally lifted. 

Ukrainians from Dnepropetrovsk (Dnipro) who have 

so far died in Putin's war with Ukraine

 

(to be continued)

Will Trump now use the excuse of distancing himself from Europe to get Putin off the sanctions hook?

In these days it is truly dangerous to even contemplate having a rest from the speed of the events that are so critically impacting on the future of Ukraine.

Whilst, as Henry Samuel (left) reports that,

"French President Emmanuel Macron accused Russian state-sponsored media of employing "lying propaganda" to try and smear his electoral campaign in an angry outburst as he stood alongside Vladimir Putin at Versailles." (Telegraph : 29 May 2017) (my emphasis),

he also reported that,

"Both leaders were also agreed the time was right for a new round of peace talks on Ukraine, Mr Macron confirmed.

They hoped to start talks under the "Normandy format" which groups the leaders of Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine, in days or weeks". (ibid Henry Samuel)

And whilst Macron and Putin were beginning to build bridges, notwithstanding Macron publicly criticising Putin's propaganda mouthpieces, RT and Sputnik, for spreading lies about him, nonetheless it was significant that Putin publicly called for the lifting of EU sanctions against Russia as a prelude to ending his war with Ukraine.

Bear in mind that, as Judy Dempsey explains,

"With the exception of European Council President Donald Tusk, other EU leaders, particularly (the fragrant) Federica Mogherini, the bloc’s foreign policy chief, have rarely challenged Putin." (Carnegie Europe : May 30, 2017) (my emphasis)

However, Judy Dempsey also suggests that,

"Now that Macron is ensconced in the Élysée Palace, Merkel has a valuable ally." (ibid Judy Dempsey)

However,  she continues,

"It’s hard to see Merkel finding the time to break the deadlock over implementing the Minsk accords, which were concluded by the Normandy format with the aim of ending the war in Ukraine, before September. Perhaps Macron’s foreign policy team has some new ideas for how to end the conflict.

Merkel herself is now walking along a political tightrope herself.

As  Joern Poltz reports,
 
"Europe can no longer completely rely on its allies, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Sunday, pointing to bruising meetings of G7 wealthy nations and NATO last week.

Merkel did not mention by name U.S. President Donald Trump, who criticised major NATO allies and refused to endorse a global climate change accord, but she told a packed beer tent in Munich that the days when Europe could completely count on others were "over to a certain extent". (Reuters : Tue May 30, 2017) (my emphasis)

This criticism of himself rather infuriated the 'thin-skinned' Donald Trump.

And so he tweeted!

"We have a MASSIVE trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay FAR LESS than they should on NATO & military," Trump tweeted. "Very bad for U.S. This will change."

This growing chasm between Europe and the US is sweet music to the ears of Putin.

As is the fact that, as Judy Dempsey speculates,

"Perhaps Macron’s foreign policy team has some new ideas for how to end the conflict [in Ukraine].

Will some of these 'new ideas' be the ending of EU sanctions against Russia, ignoring the fact that Putin is at war on all fronts with Ukraine, and has annexed, and now occupies, Ukrainian Crimea? Especially since Brexit will mean a gaping hole in the budget of the EU that now needs to be filled?

Already Trump is on the verge of ending the sanctions imposed upon Putin by former president Obama because of Putin's meddling in the US presidential elections.

Is this the thin end of Trump's wedge to lift those US sanctions imposed upon Putin because of his annexation of Ukrainian Crimea and his ongoing war with Ukraine?

Will Trump now use the excuse of distancing himself from Europe to also get Putin off the sanctions hook?

Ukrainians from Dnepropetrovsk (Dnipro) who have 

so far died in Putin's war with Ukraine

(to be continued)

Time is simply not on the side of either Trump nor Putin

The degree and extent to which the Trump-Putin connections continue to unravel on a dizzying path towards a growing chorus that is beginning to use the "impeachment" word must now be giving Putin himself sleepless nights.

As the Trump-Putin connection continues to unravel, more and more of Trump's close associates are being inexorably drawn towards the vortex of the legal case being built up against Trump as a "fit person to be President of the US".

The immediate names that come to mind are :- (full video here)

(1) Jared Kushner and  

(2) Rex Tillerson.
 

Against the backdrop of this continuing outpouring of revelations about Putin and his Kremlin clique's involvement in the election of Trump to the Presidency of the US we have the continuing and mounting problems that beset the Russian economy.

It should always be borne in mind that Putin's interference in the US presidential elections was not merely to show to the Russian people that Russia, as expemplified by himself, is a superpower but, more importantly, to deflect the gaze of the Russian population away from their deteriorating economic circumstances.

And according to Yevgeniya Goryunova,

“Russian euphoria about the annexation of Crimea has significantly weakened under the press of social and economic problems,” the Crimean political scientist says. “The Crimean theme is losing its importance,” and the only aspect of it that Moscow outlets now talk much about is the Kerch bridge (ru.krymr.com/a/28489804.html)." (Window On Eurasia:Thursday, May 18, 2017) (my emphasis) 

 Just as Trump cannot keep at bay the growing avalanche of  evidence not only about the Trump-Putin connection but, more importantly, that he tried to obstruct the FBI investigations into these connections so, too, Putin cannot simply wish away the EU-US sanctions against him that are having such a devastating economic effect on the people of Russia and on the Russian economy as a whole.

And now that US Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, former CEO of Exxon Mobil, is beginning to find himself inexorably drawn into the investigations into Trump and his associates in, and outside, the White House, can we expect to see a sudden re-emergence of Exxon Mobil trying to free istelf from the US sanctions against Putin and his kleptocratic clique before Trump is indicted with 'obstruction of Justice'?

As has been reported by Elena Holodny and Natasha Bertrand  (left) last month,

"Exxon Mobil Corp. applied to the Treasury Department for a waiver from sanctions on Russia in an effort to restart its joint venture with state oil company PAO Rosneft, according to the Wall Street Journal's Jay Solomon and Bradley Olson." (Business Insider UK : Apr. 19, 2017) (my emphasis)

Time is simply not on the side of either Trump nor Putin.

Putin will be the victor in next year's Russian presidential elections but, unless he can pull an economic rabbit out of his crumpled economic hat, the growing groundswell of Russian public opinion against his mis-management of the Russian economy could yet prove to be his downfall.

(to be continued after a short break)

Will Macron push for the lifting of sanctions against Putin?

Hardly had Emmanuel Macron settled fully into the Élysée Palace in Paris after his victory over Marine Le Pen when,

"Russian President Vladimir Putin and France's new President Emmanuel Macron held their first phone conversation and discussed possible further cooperation in resolving the Ukraine crisis, the Kremlin said in a statement on Thursday.

They also expressed readiness to develop relations between Russia and France and spoke about a possibility of future contacts, according to the statement." (Vladimir Soldatkin : Reuters : Thu May 18, 2017)

Recall that on the day following Macron winning the French presidential elections,
 
"In a telegram Putin told the new president that Russia is ready for constructive work on bilateral and global issues. He urged Macron to “overcome mutual distrust” and join forces." (Alexandra Topping (right): The Guardian : Monday 8 May 2017) (my emphasis)

Let us now cast our minds back to Macron's Moscow visit in January of 2016.

As reported by Kenneth Rapoza,

"French Finance Minister Emmanuel Macron hinted this weekend in Moscow that his country would support an end to sanctions when they come up for renewal in July. "The objective we all share is to be able to lift sanctions next summer because the process has been respected," he was quoted as saying in Le Figaro on Monday." (Forbes : Jan 25, 2016) (my emphasis)

Macron's hope for the removal of sanctions against Putin in July 2016 did, however, not materialise.

Then, just as he had done in the US presidential elections, Putin's FSB 'cyber' unit also hacked the Macron election campaign on the very eve of the French presidential elections..

Given that yesterday Macron and Putin, "...discussed possible further cooperation in resolving the Ukraine crisis", are we now to assume that, Macron has 'overcome his distrust of Putin', as urged by Putin in his congratulatory telegram to Macron after the French presidential elections?

Is it this possible overcoming of distrust against Putin by Macron that has motivated Ukrainian MP Nadiia Savchenko (left) to urge Macron in a letter addressed to him,

"Savchenko called on Macron to maintain and strengthen sanctions against Russia, as the "authority of this country only understands force and resolve"? (112UA : 10 May 2017) (my emphasis)

Putin's growing desperation to have the EU-US sanctions against him lifted, which was imposed upon him because of his illegal annexation of Ukrainian Crimea and his ongoing war with Ukraine in the Donbas, is amply illustrated by his links between Trump and his associates during the US presidential election, and the ultimate election of Trump to the presidency of the US.

Putin's recent gloating over the fact that Trump divulged top secret information to that dyed-in-the-wool Russian Foreign Secretary, Sergey Lavrov, and the Russian ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak, in the very presidential inner sanctum of the Oval Office itself, should give French President Macron cause for concern.

 
Already Macron seems to be following in the footsteps of Donald Trump in his attempt to try and control the Frenchs press.

As reported by Sylvie Corbet (left),

"Some French political reporters said that Macron's office called their media organization to designate specific journalists who will be able to cover Macron's first trip outside Europe, scheduled in Mali on Friday.

In the past, French media would decide themselves who to send on presidential trips.
......
Press freedom group Reporters Without Borders said the actions of Macron's young presidency were a "concerning signal to the press" and "could be used as a way of putting pressure on the media." (The State : May 18, 2017) (my emphasis)

Whether Macron's seeming rapproachment with Putin leads him towards devaluing the Minsk2 protocols and pushes him towards arguing for a lifting of EU sanctions against Putin now becomes a distinct possibility.

Macron may be an ardent proponent of the EU but, where sanctions are concerned, it should always be borne in mind that in 2016 he stated that,

"The objective we all share is to be able to lift sanctions next summer because the process has been respected," (ibid Kenneth Rapoza)

(to be continued)

How long can Rex Tillerson remain in the shadows of the accelerating Trump-Putin investigations?

"Power", Henry Kissinger once remarked, "is the ultimate aphrodisiac."

To which one might add, "It is also highly addictive."

No more is this being illustrated than in the tortuous manner in which Republican members of both the US Senate and US Congress are almost deperately trying to protect US President, Donald Trump, as yet another avalanche of his misdemenours descends upon their heads.

If the recent sudden, and suspicious, dismissal of FBI Director James Comey, nor the entertaining of Sergey Lavrov and Sergey Kislyak in the Oval office, and divulging to them top-secret information, was not enough cause Republican Senators and Congress members to pause in their daily fix of that powerful aphrodisiac, power, then surely yesterday's revelation that Donald Trump may be guilty of obstructing justice may make them realise that they are in the Senate and the House of Congress to represent the people that elected them, rather than simply to protect Donald Trump.

As I stated in my last blog entry,

"The victory that both Trump and Putin are now celebrating may yet turn out to be a Phyrric victory.

The scarlet thread of Maidan that binds them both is not so easily undone." (blog entry 11/5/2017)

The very foundation of Putin's meddling in the US presidential elections can be traced back to Putin's illegal annexation of Ukrainian Crimea, and his ongoing war with Ukraine in the Donbas, that led to the US-EU sanctions against him, and that is having devastating consequences on the Russian economy and, consequently, the growing impoverishment of the Russian people themselves.  

Emily Cashen (left) succinctly sums up the effect of the US-EU sanctions on the Russian economy.

" ... Since the sanctions came into place some three years ago, Russia’s economy has struggled. Between 2014 and 2015, the country’s GDP growth contracted by 3.8 percent (see Fig 1), while inflation accelerated to 15.5 percent. Now more isolated than at any point since the end of the Cold War, the nation has seen an increase in its budget deficit, wide-ranging budget cuts and even noticeable food shortages." (World Finance : April 20, 2017) (my emphasis)

And now, the scarlet thread of Maidan that indelibly binds both Trump and Putin together has once again raised its head into the headlines in the US. 

As Rachel Maddow of MSNBC reports,

Part 1

 

Part 2

The near inexplicable degree to which Trump will go in trying to protect Putin by attempting to shackle the Senate, Congress, and FBI (amongst others) investigations into Putin's assistance in getting him into the White House once again brings the "dossier" to the fore.

"On January 10, 2017, the media reported on the existence of a private intelligence dossier containing unverified allegations of misconduct and ties between Donald Trump, then President-elect, and the Russian government during the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the period preceding the election. The dossier was written by a former British MI6 intelligence officer, Christopher Steele (left), who went into hiding after the release of the dossier, but reappeared on March 7, 2017" (Wikipedia)

Critical parts of this dossier have, since its release, been verified, to the utter consternation of Donald Trump himself.

And as reported by Robert Mendick and  Robert Verkaik (right),

"An ex-KGB chief suspected of helping the former MI6 spy Christopher Steele to compile his dossier on Donald Trump may have been murdered by the Kremlin and his death covered up. it has been claimed.

Oleg Erovinkin (left), a former general in the KGB and its successor the FSB, was found dead in the back of his car in Moscow on Boxing Day in mysterious circumstances.

Erovinkin was a key aide to Igor Sechin, a former deputy prime minister and now head of Rosneft, the state-owned oil company, who is repeatedly named in the dossier." (The Telegraph :27 January 2017) (my emphasis)

The $64 question is,

"Did Tillerson (right), former CEO of Exxon Mobil and now US Secretary of State, and who has had copious dealings with Igor Sechin in the past, know at the time about this 'mysterious' death of Oleg Erovinkin linked, as it is, to a dossier of Trump's misconduct in Russia and his ties to Putin, the very Trump who gave him his present job?"

Tillerson has hidden himself in the shadows as Intelligence Committees of  the Senate and Congress, as well as the FBI and sundry other financial investigations, continue to unravel the Trump-Putin connection.

How long can he continue to remain in the shadows before he also becomes embroiled in the unfolding of the Trump-Putin connection?

(to be continued)

Trump and Putin's euphoria over their current victory may yet turn out to be a Phyrric victory.

Yesterday I wrote that,

"If, earlier, I stated that, "Putin's room for diplomatic manouvering is rapidly diminishing", the dismissal of Comey by Trump has eased the tensions in the Kremlin and, no doubt, brought a thankful respite for Putin from his diplomatic anxieties about the easing of US-EU sanctions against himself and his 'siloviki' clique in the Kremlin." (blog : Tuesday, 9 May 2017)

And so it was. 

As Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC reported yesterday,

"Vladimir Putin was asked today about the firing of James Comey and he seemed as happy as we have ever seen him when asked about US-Russia relations" (MSNBC : 10/5/2017) (my emphasis)

Adding to Putin's euphoria is the warm welcoming by Donald Trump of that Soviet dyed-in-the-wool Sergey Lavrov and the Russian ambassdor to the US, Sergey Kislyak, into Oval Office of the White House yesterday. 

The 25 minute meeting was not documented by the US press because they were excluded whilst the Russian press was not.

Whilst Trump grandstanded about the Syrian question, what he did NOT mention was the fact that Lavrov and himself ALSO discussed Ukraine.

At the same time, as reported by RFERL,

"A White House statement said Pence met with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin as President Donald Trump was meeting with Klimkin's Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov.

The statement said Pence stressed America's support for Ukraine's "territorial integrity" while urging Kyiv to "peacefully resolve the conflict" with Russia-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine." (RFERL (Associated Press) : May 11, 2017) (my emphasis) (my emphasis)

As US Vice-President Pence was urging Kyiv to peacefully resolve Putin's war with Ukraine, can we assume that Trump was "urging Lavrov to tell Putin to peacefully resolve his war with Ukraine"?  

 
As the old saying goes, "Pigs will fly"!

 
It is no co-incidence that these meetings took place a day after FBI Director James Comey was dismissed by Trump or, to put it in Trump's own words, "... You are hereby terminated and removed from office, effective immediately .." (CNN : May 10, 2017)

 It is also no co-incidence that James Comey's dismissal came as he was ramping up his investigation into the indelible links between Putin and Trump during the US presidential election.
(cf Lawrence O'Donnell)

The very root of Putin's current euphoria over the dismissal of James Comey, and the entrance of Lavrov and Kislyak into the Oval Office, lies in the fact that the US sanctions imposed upon Putin and his Kremlin clique because of Putin's illegal annexation of Ukrainian Crimea, and his ongoing war with Ukraine in the Donbas, might now be removed.

Emily Cashen (left) succinctly sums up the effect of the US-EU sanctions on the Russian economy.

" ... Since the sanctions came into place some three years ago, Russia’s economy has struggled. Between 2014 and 2015, the country’s GDP growth contracted by 3.8 percent (see Fig 1), while inflation accelerated to 15.5 percent. Now more isolated than at any point since the end of the Cold War, the nation has seen an increase in its budget deficit, wide-ranging budget cuts and even noticeable food shortages." (World Finance : April 20, 2017) (my emphasis)

Whether the current euphoria in the Oval Office and in the Kremlin will last will now be entirely dependent on the Senate and Congressional Intelligence Hearings on Putin's collusion with Trump officials during the US presidential elections that ultimately led to Trump becoming President of the US.

The victory that both Trump and Putin are now celebrating may yet turn out to be a Phyrric victory.

The scarlet thread of Maidan that binds them both is not so easily undone.

(to be continued)