Putin dismissive about brutal killing of Boris Nemtsov

"Nemtsov was working on a report presenting evidence that he believed proved Russia's direct involvement in the separatist rebellion that has raged in eastern Ukraine since last April. Ukraine and the West accuse Russia of backing the rebels with troops and sophisticated weapons. Moscow denies the accusations." (CBC News : Feb 27, 2015) (my emphasis)

So wrote a report by the Associated Press  following the brutal killing of Boris Nemtsov yesterday as he walked over a bridge tens of metres from the Kremlin itself. 

An ardent critic of Putin, Nemtsov feared that Putin would have him killed.

"In a recent interview, Mr Nemtsov had said he feared Mr Putin would have him killed because of his opposition to the war in Ukraine." (BBC News : 28 February 2015)

  
Tributes to Nemtsov are now pouring in from all over the world, urging Putin to conduct a transparent investigation into this brutal killing of a man who not only exposed the gargantuan corruption that took place in setting up Putin's Sochi Winter Olympics earlier this year ($30 billion is said to have been corruptly stolen), but who was on the verge of exposing to the Russian people the central role being played by Russia in Putin's war againt Ukraine.

According to Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov,

"Putin said the "cruel murder" had "all the signs of a contract killing" and called it a provocation -- a word meant to suggest Nemtsov was killed in order to blacken the government's reputation." (VoA : February 27, 2015)

No-one should be surprised that Putin, by using the word, "provocation", is rather dismissive of this brutal killing of Nemtsov, just as he was dismissive of the killing of Anna Politkovskaya and Alexander Litvinenko.

Reacting to this expected statement of Putin, Gary Kasparov tweeted,

" '[Journalist Anna] Politkovskaya was gunned down. [Malaysian Airlines flight] MH17 was shot out of the sky [over the conflict zone in eastern Ukraine]. Now Boris is dead. As always, Kremlin will blame opposition, or CIA, whatever.' " (ibid Voa) (my emphasis)

RT, Putin's international propaganda TV mouthpiece, immediately confirmed exactly what Kasparov said viz. As always, Kremlin will blame opposition, or CIA, whatever.' In this instance, the reporting in the west about Nemtsov's murder are simply, "fake stories".

"Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko called Nemtsov a personal friend and a "bridge" between the two countries. He said on his Facebook page that he hopes the killers will be punished." (ibid VoA)

What we now wait for is that the findings of Nemtsov about the direct involvement of Russia in eastern Ukraine should now be made public for the whole world to see.

(to be continued)

Putin's current 'empty' threats about cutting off gas supplies

In yesterday's post I ended by remarking that,

" Will the 'fragrant' Mogherini still rush into Putin's arms tomorrow?"

Lavrov and the 'fragrant Mogherini

Well .... she may not be rushing into Putin's arms, but she has had a little tete a tete with that dyed-in-the-wool Soviet foreign minister Lavrov over the phone yesterday, ostensibly to discuss Putin's threat to cut off gas supplies to Ukraine and, by implication, the EU.

The 'fragrant' Mogherini said that,

"We discussed how to solve the issue of gas supply at trilateral level," Mogherini said, referring to Russia, Ukraine and the EU."(Reuters/Dado Ruvic : Thu Feb 26, 2015)

She then went on to say that,

"There will be a meeting on Monday. The Russian energy minister will participate. We agreed that if things go well, we could develop a bilateral dimension for energy talks between EU and Russia." (ibid Reuters) (my emphasis)

Now, "The EU and Russia have for years had an "energy dialogue" to discuss energy cooperation but there has been little effort to work together since Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimea region last year, leading the EU to impose economic sanctions on Moscow." (ibid Reuters) (my emphasis)

What, therefore, is the 'fragrant' Mogherini up to by even suggesting that Russia and the EU could re-instate their bi-lateral "energy dialogue", even though Putin and his army still occupies Ukrainian Crimea, and contrary to the stand that has been taken by the EU over the previous "energy dialogue" between themselves and Russia?

And now Putin, spitting nails, has apparently, 


"...accused Kiev of threatening to cut off gas to separatist regions in the east of the country, an act which he said "smells of genocide",   

even though,


 "... in practice, the volumes for rebel areas are small and Kiev couldn't cut them off if it tried, because rebels and Russians control pipes at the border."(Reuters/Gleb Garanich : Thu Feb 26, 2015) (my emphasis)
 
Valentyn Zemlyansky informs us that,

"All these threats by ... [Putin] are not particularly frightening for us, as the situation has radically changed compared to last autumn," said Zemlyansky (pic. right), [former spokesman for Ukraine's gas firm Naftogaz]. "We've passed through the winter season - the mild weather really helped us, as well as decreased consumption by industry."

He estimated Ukraine would consume about 35 billion cubic meters of gas in 2015. That is not far out of line with what it produces itself and imports from Europe, although it will be important to build up reserves for next winter's peak." (Peter Graff and Pavel Polityuk : Reuters : Thu Feb 26, 2015) (my emphasis)

In light of what Zemlyansky has said, we have to ask ourselves, "What, exactly, is the 'fragrant' Mogherini really up to by suggesting that the EU could resume " a bilateral dimension for energy talks between EU and Russia." if  "things go well" at the energy talks on Monday between the EU, Ukraine, and Russia? 

Putin really does not have a leg to stand on regarding his empty threats about cutting off gas supplies to Ukraine and the EU. In fact, Putin is 'shooting himself in the foot' since in the very near future Ukraine will no longer have to purchase gas from him, as Zemlyansky indirectly points out. 

Are these 'empty threats' of Putin his way of trying to influence to-day's scheduled meeting of the UN's Security Council to discuss the ceasefire in ukraine?
 
"The UN Security Council (pic. right) scheduled an emergency session to discuss the fragile ceasefire in Ukraine on Friday, a year to the day since Russian troops and pro-Moscow forces began seizing ports and cities on the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea." (Bangkok Post : 27 Feb 2015) (my emphasis)

This meeting must be sticking in the craw of Putin since the UN has come out strongly against his annexation of Crimea. No doubt to try and give a 'figleaf' of respectability to his argument that his proxies and his Russian soldiers are 'adhering' to the protocols of Minsk2 he will, through the mouth of Russian UN representativeVitaly Churkin (pic. left), point to the fact that his heavy weaponry in eastern Ukraine are withdrawing from the frontline strictly according to the Minsk2 protocols.

What he will deliberately leave out is the fact that he is massing his troops and weaponry near Mariupol as a prelude to attacking that strategic port in the very near future.

As reported by Agence France-Presse 14hrs. ago (current GMT: 11.10 am 27 Feb 2015 ),

"Russia wants to secure a land corridor in eastern Ukraine that could include Mariupol but pro-Moscow rebels may wait until the spring to attack the strategic port city, the US spy chief said Thursday.

"He wants a whole entity composed of the two oblasts (regions) in eastern Ukraine which would include a land bridge to Crimea and perhaps a port in specifically Mariupol.

"We do not believe that an attack on Mariupol is imminent. I believe they will wait until the spring before they attack." (Yahoo News : 27 Feb., 2015) (my emphasis)

It is with this possibility in mind that the UK, US, and Canada, are sending military trainers to Ukraine to prepare the Ukrainian army for this offensive that Putin's generals are setting up.

Is this why Lavrov (pic. left), at a conference yesterday

" ..... accused the West of putting forward "ridiculous" demands. "Everyone understands perfectly well that there are no ideal truces and ideal cease-fires," he said." (VoA News : February 26, 2015) (my emphasis)

And what are these ridiculous demands that the West is putting foreward?

"Both the United States and some leaders in Europe have threatened to impose tougher sanctions against Moscow if it does not stop supporting pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine." (ibid VoA News) (my emphasis)

For, " there are no ideal truces and ideal cease-fires" read "Mariupol can therefore be attacked by our soldiers and proxies"

We now wait to see what the UN Security Council will come up with. But we really should not hold our breath. After all, Vitaly Churkin, Putin's mouthpiece, can simply veto anything that goes against the grain of Putin's dangerous fantasies about bringing into being Alexander Dugin's (pic. right) geopolitical dreams about "Novorossiya".

(to be continued)  

Putin finally exposed!

Finally, the truth is beginning to emerge.

It now transpires that Putin,

" ..... has been planning to annex parts of Ukraine for more than 12 months, according to sensational claims made in a Russian newspaper.

Vladimir Putin’s office reportedly compiled a detailed roadmap of how a "pro-Russian drift" could allow it to seize Crimea and some eastern provinces, just a few weeks prior to the ousting of President Viktor Yanukovych and the start of the Ukrainian crisis." (VoA : Wednesday 25 February 2015)

KyivPost has supplied a full Engllish translation of Putin's road-map for annexing eastern Ukraine.

".... an English-language translation done by the Kyiv Post of a leaked analytical note published by the Russian online newspaper Novaya Gazeta on Feb. 24. According to sources of Novaya Gazeta, one of Russia's last independent newspaeprs, this document was written and provided to the President Vladimir Putin's office for consideration between Feb. 4-12, 2014, the same month that the EuroMaidan Revolution drove President Viktor Yanukovych from power on Feb. 22, 2014." (KyivPost : Feb. 25, 2015)

 In this document it is stated that,

"Firstly, the Yanukovych regime is completely bankrupt. His political, diplomatic, financial and information support by the Russian Federation no longer makes sense." (ibid KyivPost)

Furthermore, ".... constructive and “smoothing" participation of Russia into a highly-probable process of disintegration of the Ukrainian state will not only give impulse for the Kremlin integration projects, it will also allow our country to keep, as it was mentioned above, a control over Ukrainian gas pipeline system. It will also allow to significantly change geopolitical landscape in Central and Eastern Europe, with Russia getting back one of the main roles there." (ibid KyiPost) (my emphasis)

With all of this now being revealed, how will Merkel, Hollande, and those supporting Putin in the EU, react to these revelations? 

Will it spur them on to finally 'bite the bullet' and support Ukraine with tougher economic sanctions against Putin and, more importantly, supply Poroshenko with the necessary weapons with which to defend Ukraine against Putin's road-map?

Cyprus, the money-laundering capital of Russia, gives us the answer! Cyprus President Nikos Anastasiadis ahead of a visit to Moscow, has stated that,

"“We have openly said in the Council of Europe that sanctions will not solve the problem. Sanctions will only create wider problems for the whole European Union. It turns out that these sanctions will be paid for by the people from the smallest of the countries,” he said, adding that Cyprus is very closely connected with Russia." (RT : February 24, 2015) (my emphasis)

And why is he against sanctions from the EU on Russia? Because,

Nikos Anastasiadis

“Our [Cyprus's]economy and defense are highly dependent on our relations with Russia. Thousands of Russian companies work in Cyprus, we have large investments made by the citizens of Russia,” he said. “Our tourism also strongly depends on Russians.” (ibid RT) (my emphasis)

And as these revelations hit the international community, Michael Fallon, UK Defence Secretary, reported to the House of Commons (February 25, 2015) that Britain will be supplying Ukraine with training and logistics, and possibly more, so that it can defend itself against Putin's army.

In the US and Canada similar moves are afoot.

"Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) said on Wednesday that the administration should impose tougher sanctions against Russia in the wake of additional ceasefire violations in Ukraine.

Sen. Bob Menendez

"........it is time to fully implement the law.
"The legislation was necessary in December and even more so today... I appreciate the administration's comprehensive efforts to counter Russian agression, but I also believe it is not enough," he said. "Fully implementing the sanctions and the assistance in the Ukraine Freedom Support Act will help Ukraine restore its sovereignty. It will restore its territorial integrity, and it will help deter Russia from further destabalizing the region." (The Hill : February 25, 2015)
The Ukraine Freedom Support Act includes:

"SEC. 6. INCREASED MILITARY ASSISTANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE. (a) In General.--The President is authorized to provide defense articles, defense services, and training to the Government of Ukraine for the purpose of countering offensive weapons and reestablishing the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, including anti-tank and anti-armor weapons, crew weapons and ammunition, counter-artillery radars to identify and target artillery batteries, fire control, range finder, and optical and guidance and control equipment, tactical troop- operated surveillance drones, and secure command and communications equipment, pursuant to the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), and other relevant provisions of law." (Congres.Gov) (my emphasis)

Defence Minister Jason Kenney

In Canada,

"The Harper cabinet is actively and seriously considering whether Canada should join the U.S. and Britain in a military training mission to shore up embattled Ukrainian troops, Defence Minister Jason Kenney said Wednesday." (Global News : February 25, 2015)

It is now to be seen whether Merkel and Hollande, together with Putin's supporters in the EU, will be supportive of the actions that Britain, the US, and Canada are taking in helping Ukraine to defend itself against Putin's proxies and Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine by dramatically increasing EU sanctions against Russia. 

Poland and the Baltic states are more than willing also to support Ukraine, with defensive weapons if necessary.

Cyprus's President Nikos Anastasiadis, who has gone 'cap-in-hand' to Putin to ask for a bailout of his faltering economy, would be wise to educate himself on the parlous state of the Russian economy itself.

Putin is willing to 'bail him out' simply because he does not want to see the 'money-laundering' capital of Russia go under economically. What will then happen to all that Russian criminal money languishing in the banks of Cyprus?

We now wait patiently to see just what the EU ministers will do now that Putin's Ukrainian adventurism has finally been exposed. Will the 'fragrant' Mogherini still rush into Putin's arms tomorrow?

(to be continued)

Is Putin finally being confronted?

Oh! What a tangled web we weave

When first we practice to deceive

It would seem that the 'fragrant' Mogherini may be running into the arms of Putin this Friday or so, at least, says the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexei Meshkov. (KyivPost : Feb. 24, 2015) (pic. the 'fragrant' Mogherini and Sergey Lavrov, that dyed-in-the-wool Soviet foreign minister of Putin)

On a Sunday program (22 Feb. 2015) of the Italian television channel RAI-3 «She tempo che fa» she answered a question of the presenter as follows: 

The 'fragrant Mogherini

""The real question Putin is: what are your intentions? Back to the Cold War? We will not follow this path, for us the logic of the fifties - it's not logic, rather it was his logic (Putin), these last few months. But before the erroneous logic is the worst thing you can do - is to follow this logic. What you need to do is to go back to work, negotiations, now it is his turn to give us the answer. Cease-fire agreement had been reached, an action plan, revision of the constitution, decentralization, it is clear that the situation remains very difficult. Now he (Putin) can prove that he can be part of the solution that will lead to cooperation. It is in the interests of Russian. There's still time. It is in the interests of Russians, Ukrainians, Europeans need to find a solution to this conflict and return to work. " (Cyplive : 24.02.2015) (my emphasis)

But what does the following actually mean?

• "what are your intentions?" Has it not yet sunk into her head that Putin's intentions is to annex bits of Ukraine whilst at the same time trying to prevent the Ukrainians from seeing their future as being part of the EU rather than being a vassal of Russia?
• "for us the logic of the fifties - it's not logic, rather it was his logic ...... But before the erroneous logic is the worst thing you can do - is to follow this logic." How can the 'logic' of the fifties not be 'logic', whilst at the same time be 'logic' for Putin? Surely if it's 'not logic' then it must be 'illogical'
• "What you need to do is to go back to work, negotiations, now it is his turn to give us the answer." Is this to mean that whatever answer Putin gives us we simply have to accept it?
• "Europeans need to find a solution to this conflict and return to work." Has Putin's war with Ukraine put the European nations out of work?

With a  High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy like the 'fragrant Mogherini, who needs an enemy of Ukraine, like Putin, when she is doing rather a good job of being one herself? Is it any wonder that many EU states were against her appointment as the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

And whilst the 'fragrant' Mogherini is considering running into the arms of Putin in Moscow this coming Friday, the foreign ministers of Russia, Ukraine, Germany, and France, met in Paris yesterday (23 Feb. 2015) to try and rescue the failed Minks2 ceasefire.

As reported from Paris by the Associated Press (AP),

"Talks about a fragile peace deal for Ukraine ended in tension Tuesday, with differences over who is at fault over continued violence despite a cease-fire.

The foreign ministers of Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France met in Paris amid uncertainty that the accord will hold — in particular a promised withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line." (AP : 24 Feb., 2015) (my emphasis)

   (Ger) Steinheimer         (Ukr) Klimkin               (Fr) Fabius              (Ru) Lavrov

And while these talks in Paris dissolved into nothingness, David Cameron, UK Prime Minister, has decided to send British troops to Ukraine to act purely in a training capacity.

 

"The United Kingdom stunned officials across Europe with a unilateral announcement that it would send 75 troops to Ukraine within the month to train the country's embattled forces in four skill sets – infantry, intelligence, logistics and medical." (KyivPost : Feb. 25, 2015)

"The UK decision followed hot on the heels of the Paris meeting's conclusion, implying impatience and frustration with yet another fruitless round of talks with an intransigent Russia." (ibid KyivPost) (my emphasis)

Lt. General Ben Hodges

"For its part, the US has already pledged a full battalion of advisers to help train three Ukrainian battalions in spring this year, at the Yavariv training center in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv.

.....The US Army Europe commander, Lt. General Ben Hodges, said American soldiers will teach the Ukrainians how to better defend themselves against "Russian and rebel artillery and rockets." " (ibid KyivPost)

The US and Britain should now take the next step and supply Ukraine with defensive weapons.

Mindful of the fact that President Obama is a 'hairs breadth' away from sending defensive weappons to Ukraine; Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov starts to dish out threats in the event of President Obama giving the green light for sending defensive weapons to Ukraine.
 

Sergey Ryabkov

"If the US were to supply Ukraine with ammunition and weapons, it would “explode the whole situation” in eastern Ukraine and Russia would be forced to respond “appropriately,” Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said.

“It would be a major blow to the Minsk agreements and would explode the whole situation,” TASS quoted Ryabkov as saying.
 
Moscow would not be able to remain indifferent “to such provocative actions,” he added. “We’ll have to respond appropriately.” (RT : February 24, 2015) (my emphasis)

How Ryabkov could keep a straight face when Putin's Russian soldiers and proxies in eastern Ukraine blew Minsk2 out of the water when they attacked and over-ran Debaltseve, and are at this very moment preparing for an attack upon Mariupol, should simply leave everyone speechless, especially the likes of Merkel and Hollande. 

These threats of Putin should be confronted head-on, as Prime Minister David Cameron suggests.

"“People will be looking at Mariupol as the next potential flashpoint, and if that were to happen, I think the argument for further action would be overwhelming. I think that would be the view of countries like Poland, the Baltic states and many others." (ibid KyivPost) (my emphasis) 

David Cameron and Petro Poroshenko

The $64 question that we should now all be asking ourselves is,

The 'fragrant' Mogherini with Lavrov and Putin

"Will the 'fragrant' Mogherini be running into the arms of Putin this coming Friday, as Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexei Meshkov has suggested, in light of all these developments that have taken place?"

Exactly whose side is she on?




(to be continued)

What, now, will the US and the EU do to stop Putin?

Yesterday (23/2/2015) Putin gave an interview on Russian TV that was, no doubt, watched by the vast majority of Russians. There are some salient points that he mentioned viz.

1. Mr Putin was asked if there was a real threat of war, given the situation in eastern Ukraine. "I think that such an apocalyptic scenario is unlikely and I hope this will never happen," he said
2. As for Russia invading Ukraine, President Putin once again shrugged off evidence that he's deployed troops to help the rebels. He said Kiev was claiming that to hide its humiliation at being defeated by former miners and tractor drivers.
3. The Russian leader also said the Minsk deal had become an "international legal document" following UN Security Council approval of a Russian-drafted resolution endorsing it. (BBC News Europe : 24 February 2015) (my emphasis)

Point (1) is simply a baldfaced brazen lie. I am reminded of a talk that Putin gave to students in St. Petersburg last year (2014), when he threatened nuclear war if  there should be any military response from the west to what was then taking place in eastern Ukraine.

Point (2) is another brazen lie that he told the Russian people. Putin and his Kremlin acolytes have been singing this mantra since the start of the criminal uprising in eastern Ukraine that he has orchestrated from the very beginning. The growing number of Russian soldiers that have died in eastern Ukraine cannot forever be concealed from the Russian people.

Earlier this month, at the Munich Security Conference, Poroshenko presented proof of the Russian soldiers that have died in eastern Ukraine.

Point (3) is admirably dealy with by John Kerry. Putin is himself 'breaking' the Minsk deal [that has] become an "international legal document" following UN Security Council approval of a Russian-drafted resolution endorsing it. What recently happened in Debaltseve is ample evidence of him trampling all over the Minsk2 agreements, as is the current and increasing build-up of Russian and his proxy forces on the outskirts of Mariupol in preparation for an attack on this Ukrainian port.

  
In this clip from his interview, Putin also says that,

 ''A big European country like Ukraine should – in the first place – return the nation to normal, restore the economy, society and relations with the south-east of the country in a civilized way and ensure legitimate rights and interests of the people in Donbass,” said Putin. (Sofia News Agency : February 24, 2015, Tuesday) (my emphasis)

But what about the effect that the sanctions against Russia are having on the Russian economy; sanctions that are a direct result of his war with Ukraine, and his overwhelming support of the rebels in eastern Ukraine with both Russian soldiers and sophisticated Russian military equipment.

As reported in the the Moscow Times (Jan. 26 2015),

"Russia's consumer rights watchdog said Monday that it had imposed a temporary ban on salt imports from a state-owned Ukrainian producer, citing a violation of legislation.

Artyomsol exports salt to 22 countries in Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States, which groups former Soviet republics. Its annual capacity is more than 7 million tons and it has had an estimated 24 percent share of the Russian market."

Thanks to Putin, has salt has now become a 'prized' commodity for the Russian consumer?

Even though John Kerry has stated that yet more sanctions could descend upon Russia, thanks to Putin trampling all over the recently agreed Minsk2 ceasefire, an "international legal document"; the question remains whether sanctions on their own will stop Putin from spilling his war with Ukraine into wider Europe.

Now, more than ever, is the time to supply Ukraine with defensive armaments to prevent Putin from attacking Mariupol.

Andrius Kubilius, a former PM of Lithuania, expresses rather succinctly what options are now open to the West to stop Putin from escalating the war in eastern Ukraine.

The next few days will determine what actions against Putin will come into force from both the US and the EU.

(to be continued)

Time to arm Ukraine against Putin

Matthew Holehouse yesterday reported that,

Dr. Liam Fox (former UK Defence Sec.)

"Dr [Liam] Fox warns that the West must not “appease” Putin, and argues that while sanctions are harming the Russian economy, the President appears indifferent to the sufferings of his citizens.
Instead, Nato powers must “give the Ukrainians the capabilities they most require in order to defend themselves against the military superiority of the pro-Russian separatists and their Kremlin allies." (The Telegraph :  21 Feb 2015) (my emphasis)

Finally many are waking up to the lies and deceptions of Putin. Typical of his 'maskirovka' strategy; Putin's proxies and Russian soldiers are to start implementing the withdrawal of heavy artillery from Donetsk and other unimportant military objectives, whilst building up their forces for an impending advance on Mariupol.

As reported yesterday in Aljazeera International,

"The Ukrainian military said the rebels were pressing on with attacks on government forces near Mariupol, a port in government hands that is seen as the rebels' next major target.
Spokesman Andriy Lysenko said a military train carrying 60 armored vehicles including tanks had arrived in the town of Amvrosiivka from Russia on Saturday. A convoy of military equipment had later crossed the border near Novoazovsk, east of Mariupol on the Sea of Azov.
He said fighting was in progress at the village of Shyrokyne, east of Mariupol." (Reuters as reported in Aljazeera: February 22, 2015) (my emphasis)

Lt Col Anatoliy Stelmakh

And three hours ago (current BST : 10.45),

"The Ukrainian military has said it cannot start withdrawing heavy weapons from the front line in the east until the rebels stop shelling its positions.
Military spokesman Lt Col Anatoliy Stelmakh told reporters the rebels had not stopped firing." (BBC News Europe : 23 February 2015)

And yesterday Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, speaking on 'Face The Nation' (22 Feb. 2015), said that

" .....the U.S. handling of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine represents a "shameful" chapter of American history.

"I'm ashamed of my country, I'm ashamed of my president and I'm ashamed of myself that I haven't done more to help these people," McCain said in an interview on CBS' "Face the Nation." (my emphasis)

 Furthermore that,

"Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande, ...........  "legitimized for the first time in 70 years the dismemberment of a country in Europe." (ibid Face The Nation) (my emphasis)

Meanwhile,

Merkel and the Pope

"Pope Francis and German Chancellor Angela Merkel discussed the conflict in Ukraine and the fight against poverty during a private audience on Saturday. (Daniela Petroff : AP : February 22, 2015) (my emphasis)

Since this was a 'private audience', we shall never know what was said between them. Was Merkel simply 'filling him in' on what the current German strategy towards events in Ukraine is, or was she summoned by the Pope.

And whilst Merkel was having an audience with the Pope, "an explosion at a pro-Ukrainian peace rally in Kharkiv has left at least three people dead and scores more injured. A police officer and a leader of the city’s Euromaidan movement are among the dead, local officials report." (Ukraine Today : 22 Feb 2015) (my emphasis)

David Stern reports that,

"Security service detained persons who may have been involved in the preparation and carrying out of crimes of a terrorist nature in Kharkiv, including the explosion," security spokesman Markian Lubkivskyi wrote on his Facebook page.

He later said the four suspects were Ukrainian citizens who had received instruction and weapons in the Russian city of Belgorod, just across the border." (BBC News : 22 February 2015) (my emphasis)

"Kharkiv has been the target of numerous attacks in recent months. According to a Foreign Policy report, the Interior Ministry has declared that 700 separatists have been detained in the city, and several attacks have struck Ukraine's second-largest city since October." ( Eliott C. McLaughlin : CNN : February 22, 2015)

This heinous crime against innocent people merely underscores the fact that Putin is a sponsor of 'terrorism' against the Ukrainian people, on a par with the 'terrorism' supported by Hamas, Iran, and the Taliban in particular.

We now await to see whether the US will send arms to Ukraine within the next few days, and exactly what the EU will decide to do with regard to also sending arms to Ukraine and increasing sanctions against Putin's Russia.

(to be continued)

Putin preparing to attack Mariupol (20 Feb., 2015)

Finally it would seem that the EU is waking up to Putin's delusional ambition about re-creating the fiction of "Novorossiya". Putin is now treating the EU with more than contempt. What recently happened in Debaltseve is but the most recent in a catalogue of lies and deception that he has used to lead the likes of Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande, in particular, by the nose.

Yet, like 'gluttons for punishment',

"German Chancellor Angela Merkel told supporters that "Germany and France together, will not ease off on doing everything so that Ukraine can go its way and have its territorial integrity -- but we want to do it with Russia, not against Russia." (Fox News : February 20, 2015) (my emphasis)

                        Angela Merkel                                  Francois Hollande

At the same time,

Sen. Lindsey Graham

Sen. John McCain

"Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a statement, calling the deal a “delusional piece of paper.” ......

“Persisting with the illusion of a cease-fire will only give Putin the cover he wants to plan his next act of aggression inside of Ukraine,” they said, accusing President Obama and other leaders of using “any available excuse not to provide defensive arms.” (ibid Fox News) (my emphasis)

In yesterday's blog entry I underlined the fact that 'Mariupol' is the next target of Putin.
Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C are of the same opinion.

"McCain and Graham predicted the next offensive will likely occur in nearby Mariupol." (ibid Fox News)

Since the signing of the first Minsk agreement on 5 September 2014,

• a countless number of telephone conversations have taken place between Merkel and Putin,
• and between Merkel, Putin and Hollande...
• There have even been many calls between President Obama and Putin, as recently as a few days ago ....
• a new Minsk agreement was signed between Merkel, Poroshenko, Hollande, and Putin just over a week ago ....
• this ceasefire, like the first one, has been systematically torn up by Putin and his proxies and Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine
• Putin and his proxies, together with his Russian soldiers, are now preparing for the invasion of Mariupol with a veritable avalanche of Russian military equipment that has crossed the Ukrainian-Russian border into eastern Ukraine.

And yet Merkel, Hollande, and Obama wish merely to add to the thousands of words that have already been spoken to the delusional Putin, as if by some miracle he will turn into a reasonable and peace-loving  person.

Yet many now, in both the EU and in the US, are shouting at them from the rafters that he simply will not listen to their 'diplomatic pleadings' as the evidence of his past and current behaviour amply illustrates.

Only yesterday, the House of Lords EU committee [correctly] claimed [that] Europe "sleepwalked" into the [Ukrainian] crisis.

" .... for too long the EU's relationship with Moscow had been based on the "optimistic premise" that Russia was on a trajectory to becoming a democratic country.

The result, it said, was a failure to appreciate the depth of Russian hostility when the EU opened talks aimed at establishing an "association agreement" with Ukraine in 2013." (BBC News UK: 20 February 2015) (my emphasis)

However, as a Foreign Office spokeswoman quite correctly states,

" ...... no-one could have predicted the scale of the "unjustifiable and illegal" Russian intervention in eastern Ukraine.

"The blame lies squarely with the pro-Russian separatists, backed by the Russian authorities, not with an Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine which had been under negotiation for more than seven years before Russia decided to illegally invade and then annex part of its neighbour," she said. (ibid BBC) (my emphasis)

It really is quite stagerring that for almost a year, since the annexation of Ukrainian Crimea and the fomenting of, and military support of, by Putin of the rebels in eastern Ukraine; Merkel and Hollande are still trying to seek a so-called 'diplomatic' solution in the face of Putin practically walking all over them.

            Ursula von der Leyen

Yet Angela Merkel was quick to send troops and military equipment to fight against ISIL in Iraq.

"The German and Swedish governments have announced plans to increase military aid to Kurdish forces battling Islamic State in Iraq." (Max Metzger : Newsweek : 1/12/15) 

(picture shows German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (2nd R) greets Kurdish forces female recruits at the Zeravani Training Centre in Bnaslava near Arbil, north of Iraq January 12, 2015) (note the date!)

For the Germans; what, really, is the difference between the terrorists in Iraq, and those in eastern Ukraine?

Two words rather sums it up viz. "Russlandversteher or Putinversteher"

As the Economist (May 10th 2014) pointed out many months ago,

"When Germans add the word Versteher (one who understands) to a term, they generally mix flattery with irony. So a Frauenversteher (one who understands women) is usually a man who boasts excessively about his knowledge of the opposite sex. The label is now being attached to so-called Russlandversteher or Putinversteher: members of the [German] elite or intelligentsia who gush with empathy for Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, on talk shows, in journals and at dinner parties." (my emphasis)

So here, in their own backyard, many EU politicians are too scared to send military equipment to Ukraine's Poroshenko, who is fighting Putin-backed terrorists, but more than willing to with military equipment and with boots on the ground, fight terrorists thousands of miles away.

As Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., so succinctly stated, Merkel, like so many other EU leaders, will use,
 
 “any available excuse not to provide [Ukraine with] defensive arms.” (ibid Fox News) (my emphasis)

This is what is emboldening Putin to prepare for his imminent attack on Mariupol.

(to be continued)

Putin will not allow either UN or EU 'ceasefire' monitors in eastern Ukraine

Now that Debaltseve has fallen into the hands of Putin's proxies and his Russian soldiers, there is an urgency that the borders between the occupied eastern Ukraine territory and the rest of Ukraine be fully patrolled by observers of the 'ceasefire'. The paltry 250 OSCE observers are simply not enough to fully ensure that the 'ceasefire' holds.

To this end, Poroshenko has called for,

"..... UN peacekeepers to be deployed to eastern Ukraine to enforce a ceasefire.
At an emergency security meeting [of Ukraine’s Security Council] , he said such a force would help guarantee security "in a situation where the promise of peace is not being kept".(BBC News Europe : 19 February 2015) (my emphasis)

Putin is rather livid that Poroshenko now aims to have international monitors of the 'ceasefire' that his proxies and Russian soldiers have, with impunity, broken these last few days. It was therefore to be expected that his mouthpiece at the UN, Vitaly Churkin, blew a gasket on hearing about the call of Poroshenko for UN peacekeepers, and immediately proclaimed that,

Churkin

“I think it’s a little bit disturbing, because they just signed the Minsk agreements on February 12. And the Minsk agreements provide for the role of the OSCE; there is nothing about the UN or European Union. So for them to start talking immediately about something else… I think instead of coming up with new ideas they should really work harder on implementing what they agreed on,” (RT: February 18, 2015) (my emphasis)

Samantha Power

That Churkin can say this with a straight face simply beggars belief when, as US Ambassador to the UN, Samatha Power, has recently pointed out,

"Russia signs agreements then does everything within its power to undermine them. Russia champions the sovereignty of nations and then acts as if a neighbour's borders do not exist." (BBC News Europe : 17 February 2015). (my emphasis)

Michael Fallon

It is with this in mind that Michael Fallon, UK Secretary of Defence, has

"...called for Nato states to be prepared for aggression from Russia "in whatever form it takes", and added that "Nato is getting ready" for such circumstances:

"I'm worried about Putin. I'm worried about his pressure on the Baltics, the way he is testing Nato." (Anoosh Chakelian : New Statesman :19 February, 2015) (my emphasis)

Poroshenko's call for UN peacekeepers, or an EU policing force, to act as monitors of the 'ceasefire' along the borders of eastern Ukraine and rebel-held territory should be immediately implemented as a preventative measure against the impeding attack by Putin's forces on Mariupol. 

Without Mariupol, Putin will NOT have his land-bridge between Russia and Crimea.

He will not stop until this aim is achieved. As Samantha Power has pointed out, "Russia champions the sovereignty of nations and then acts as if a neighbour's borders do not exist."

He will, however, have to fight his way through UN (or EU) 'ceasefire' monitors. 


With his pathological mind-set about "Novorossiya" he may, indeed, simply ignore either UN or EU 'ceasefire' monitors and simply go ahead with his invasion of Mariupol, just as he has ignored protocol when sending his nuclear bombers to fly along the English Channel without having their transponders on. Having their transponders on would signal to other commercial aircraft that they are in the vicinity, and so prevent a possible collision between them.

It is this dangerous behaviour of Putin that Michael Fallon is rightly worried about, as are the Baltic states of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. These states have large populations of Russians, and Putin's nationalist propaganda blares out of their TV screens each and every day. Indeed, Putin has already indirectly threatened them.

"If I wanted, in two days I could have Russian troops not only in Kiev, but also in Riga, Vilnius, Tallinn, Warsaw and Bucharest," Mr Putin allegedly told President Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine, reported Süddeutsche Zeitung, a German newspaper." ( Justin Huggler, Berlin : The Telegraph :18 Sep 2014) (my emphasis)


We now wait to see what the EU decides in relation to Poroshenko's call for 'ceasefire' monitors.

It can be expected that Germany's Angela Merkel will try to spike this suggestion of Poroshenko to the relief, no doubt, of many other EU countries sympathetic towards (or fearful of ) Putin.
 
And the UN?

"UN peacekeeping operations are deployed with the consent of the main parties to the conflict. This requires a commitment by the parties to a political process. Their acceptance of a peacekeeping operation provides the UN with the necessary freedom of action, both political and physical, to carry out its mandated tasks." (UN Peacekeeping)

Given Vitaly Churkin's 'hissy fit' on hearing about the suggestion of Poroshenko regarding UN peacekeepers being deployed in eastern Ukraine; it is obvious that Putin will simply say "nyet".

However, this response of his will reveal his contempt for the 'ceasefire'.

Putin will have to tread more carefully if the EU does decide to put together an EU policing force to monitor the 'ceasefire'. Such a force WILL NOT require his consent. It is for this reason that Poroshenko would prefer to see an EU policing force in operation rather than a UN peacekeeping force. The latter is 'dead in the water' even before it is discussed.

Unfortunately, Putin has many 'marionettes' in the EU that he controls. What is the guessing that they will speak as 'one voice' and also say "nyet"?

(to be continued)

Putin has publicly relegated the Minsk 'ceasefire' agreement to the dustbin of history

Yesterday the prime minister of Hungary, Victor Orban, met with Putin in Budapest, ostensibly to,

".... negotiate a new agreement for Russian gas supplies." (BBC News Europe : 17 February 2015)

Victor Orban is considered to be,

" ... among Mr Putin's closest allies in Europe." (ibid BBC) (my emphasis)
 
No doubt with the Hungarian uprising in 1956 in mind,

"Some 2,000 people have marched through the Hungarian capital, Budapest, ahead of talks between Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Russian President Vladimir Putin" (ibid BBC)

 
After their meeting, Putin gave a press conference about the continuing fighting in eastern Ukraine. There is something rather ominous about the 'smirk' on his face at the start of his press conference.

Putin legitimises the breaking of the ceasefire by his proxies and Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine, and actually suggests that the Ukrainian forces defending their country should lay down their arms and simply surrender to the forces that he controls. 

Yet it has been but a few days ago since the Minsk agreements about a 'full' ceasefire in eastern Ukraine, a ceasefire that Putin himself endorsed at a press conference.

And now, to add insult to injury, Vitaly Churkin, Russian ambassador to the UN, drafted a resolution concerning the situation in Ukraine that was unanimously approved by the Council.
 
"The UN Security Council on Tuesday (17 Feb. 2015) unanimously adopted a resolution endorsing measures for the implementation of the new truce on Ukraine crisis.
In the Russian-drafted resolution, the Council reaffirmed "its full respect for the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine," and expressed "its grave concern at the tragic events and violence in eastern regions of Ukraine." (China Europe : Feb. 17 (Xinhua)) (my emphasis)

Ambassador Samantha Power

"US Ambassador Samantha Power welcomed the agreement but said that Russia had to prove its commitment to peace. ...

"Russia signs agreements then does everything within its power to undermine them. Russia champions the sovereignty of nations and then acts as if a neighbour's borders do not exist." (ibid BBC) (my emphasis)


It is blatantly obvious that Putin is not concerned at all about breaking agreements. 

Putin is being driven not only by the fact that his 'ardent' supporters in the EU (including the 'fragrant' Mogherini, practically all the right-wing and extreme right-wing MEP's, the Czech president, Victor Orban, Matteo Renzi and, more recently, Alexis Tsipras, the new Greek prime minister) will ensure that the EU will not be able to talk with one voice about how to help Ukraine, nor will the EU and the US see 'eye to eye' about what further actions against Russia should be put in place so that the costs to Russia of Putin's adventurism in eastern Ukraine is ratcheted up.

Putin is not simply 'cocking a snook' at the US and the EU, he is trying to elevate himself even above the UN itself, which he also treats with utter contempt.

That 'smirk' on his face at the start of his press conference in Hungary yesterday is very telling indeed. But what is even more disconcerting is that Putin is writing the 'hymn sheet' from which his kleptocratic clique at the Kremlin is singing in unison. From Lavrov to Churkin; as soon as a lie emanates from the mouth of Putin, that lie becomes their mantra.

The fear of himself that Putin is creating within the Kremlin mirrors that which Stalin created. Is there a silent  Khrushchev amongst his kleptocratic clique at the Kremlin?

(to be continued)